ArticleBrain sciences2022
Patient Safety Comparison of Frameless and Frame-Based Stereotactic Navigation for Brain Biopsy-A Single Center Cohort Study.
Article in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of the Diagnostic Efficacy of Frameless Stereotactic Biopsy (Varioguide) with Other Methods Reported in the Literature: A Single-Center Experience.Journal of clinical practice and research · 2026Article
- Diagnostic performance and safety of stereotactic frame-based biopsy for sub centimeter intracranial lesions: A matched cohort analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Comparison of the predictive value of intraoperative MRI and intraoperative histopathological examination for diagnostic stereotactic biopsy yield in patients with brain gliomas.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Functional-guided frameless stereotactic biopsy of highly eloquent brain tumors.Brain & spine · 2025Article
- Comparison of Navigated and Frame-Based Stereotactic Biopsy-A Single-Center Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Application accuracy of a frameless optical neuronavigation system as a guide for craniotomies in dogs.Acta veterinaria Scandinavica · 2023Article
- Combined Use of Frameless Neuronavigation and In Situ Optical Guidance in Brain Tumor Needle Biopsies.Brain sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leksell stereotactic system-based aspiration biopsy is a common procedure in the neurosurgical treatment of deep-seated or multiple brain lesions. This study aimed to evaluate the benefit of frameless biopsy using VarioGuide compared to frame-based biopsy using the Leksell stereotactic system (LSS). We analyzed all brain biopsies using VarioGuide or LSS at our neurooncological Department of Neurosurgery in the University Hospital of Bonn between January 2018 and August 2020. We analyzed demographic data, duration of surgery, size of lesion, localization, and early complications. Uni-variable analyses were carried out on data from both groups. In total, 109 biopsies were compared (40 VarioGuide vs. 69 LSS). Patients with VarioGuide were significant older (74 (62−80) years vs. 67 (57−76) years; p = 0.03) and had a shorter duration of general anesthesia (163 (138−194) min vs. 193 (167−215) min, p < 0.001). We found no significant differences in surgery duration (VarioGuide median 28 min (IQR 20−38); LSS: median 30 min (IQR 25−39); p = 0.1352) or in early complication rates (5% vs. 7%; p = 0.644). A slightly higher false negative biopsy rate was registered in the LSS group (3 vs. 1; p = 0.1347). The size of the lesions also did not differ significantly between the two groups (18.31 ± 26.35 cm3 vs. 12.63 ± 14.62; p = 0.15). Our data showed that biopsies performed using VarioGuide took significantly less time than LSS biopsies and did not differ in complication rates. Both systems offered a high degree of patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.