ArticleBiology2022
Adiabatic Invariant of Center-of-Mass Motion during Walking as a Dynamical Stability Constraint on Stride Interval Variability and Predictability.
Article in Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human walking exhibits properties of global stability, and local dynamic variability, predictability, and complexity. Global stability is typically assessed by quantifying the whole-body center-of-mass motion while local dynamic variability, predictability, and complexity are assessed using the stride interval. Recent arguments from general mechanics suggest that the global stability of gait can be assessed with adiabatic invariants, i.e., quantities that remain approximately constant, even under slow external changes. Twenty-five young healthy participants walked for 10 min at a comfortable pace, with and without a metronome indicating preferred step frequency. Stride interval variability was assessed by computing the coefficient of variation, predictability using the Hurst exponent, and complexity via the fractal dimension and sample entropy. Global stability of gait was assessed using the adiabatic invariant computed from averaged kinetic energy value related to whole-body center-of-mass vertical displacement. We show that the metronome alters the stride interval variability and predictability, from autocorrelated dynamics to almost random dynamics. However, despite these large local variability and predictability changes, the adiabatic invariant is preserved in both conditions, showing the global stability of gait. Thus, the adiabatic invariant theory reveals dynamical global stability constraints that are "hidden" behind apparent local walking variability and predictability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.