Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36138756›Full record

ArticleBiology2022

DNA Barcode Gap Analysis for Multiple Marker Genes for Phytoplankton Species Biodiversity in Mediterranean Aquatic Ecosystems.

Eftychia Tzafesta, Benedetta Saccomanno, Francesco Zangaro, Maria Rosaria Vadrucci, Valeria Specchia, Maurizio Pinna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eftychia TzafestaDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies, DiSTeBA, University of Salento, via Monteroni 165, 73100 Lecce, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3330-2163
Benedetta SaccomannoDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies, DiSTeBA, University of Salento, via Monteroni 165, 73100 Lecce, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4091-1015
Francesco ZangaroDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies, DiSTeBA, University of Salento, via Monteroni 165, 73100 Lecce, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5852-5104
Maria Rosaria VadrucciRegional Agency for the Environmental Prevention and Protection (ARPA Puglia), Corso Trieste 27, 70126 Bari, Italy.
Valeria SpecchiaDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies, DiSTeBA, University of Salento, via Monteroni 165, 73100 Lecce, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1051-6014
Maurizio PinnaDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies, DiSTeBA, University of Salento, via Monteroni 165, 73100 Lecce, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8335-4098

Funding

EU ADRION programme ImPrEco project N.450Italian Ministry of the University FFABR 2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The implementation of DNA metabarcoding and environmental DNA (eDNA) to the biodiversity assessment and biomonitoring of aquatic ecosystems has great potential worldwide. However, DNA metabarcoding and eDNA are highly reliant on the coverage of the DNA barcode reference libraries that are currently hindered by the substantial lack of reference sequences. The main objective of this study was to analyze the current coverage of DNA barcode reference libraries for phytoplankton species of the aquatic Mediterranean ecoregion in the southeast of Italy (Apulia Region) in order to assess the applicability of DNA metabarcoding and eDNA in this area. To do so, we investigated three main DNA barcode reference libraries, BOLD Systems, GenBank and SILVA, for the availability of DNA barcodes of the examined phytoplankton species. The gap analysis was conducted for three molecular gene markers, 18S, 16S and COI. The results showed a considerable lack of barcodes for all three markers. However, among the three markers, 18S had a greater coverage in the reference libraries. For the 18S gene marker, the barcode coverage gap across the three types of ecosystems examined was 32.21-39.68%, 60.12-65.19% for the 16S marker gene, and 72.44-80.61 for the COI marker gene. Afterwards, the interspecific genetic distance examined on the most represented molecular marker, 18S, was able to distinguish 80% of the species mined for lakes and 70% for both marine and transitional waters. Conclusively, this work highlights the importance of filling the gaps in the reference libraries, and constitutes the basis towards the advancement of DNA metabarcoding and eDNA application for biodiversity assessment and biomonitoring.

Indexed as

aquatic ecosystemseDNA metabarcoding and eDNAgenetic distancesmarker genesphytoplankton

Identifiers

PMID36138756
PMCPMC9495960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.