Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36138601›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2022

The Effect of a Brief Physician-Delivered Neurobiologically Oriented, Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (Brief-CBT) Intervention on Chronic Pain Acceptance in Youth with Chronic Pain-A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Mark K Simmonds, Bruce D Dick, Michelle J Verrier, Kathy L Reid, Kathryn Jamieson-Lega, Keith J Balisky, Alison E Davey, Katherine M Freeman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mark K SimmondsDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 2-150 Clinical Sciences Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G3, Canada.
Bruce D DickDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 2-150 Clinical Sciences Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0404-4927
Michelle J VerrierDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 2-150 Clinical Sciences Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G3, Canada.
Kathy L ReidDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada.
Kathryn Jamieson-LegaCBI Health-Edmonton Southwest, 6103 Currents Drive NW, Suite 310, Edmonton, AB T6W 2Z4, Canada.
Keith J BaliskyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 2-150 Clinical Sciences Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G3, Canada.
Alison E DaveySarum Ward, Salisbury District Hospital, Odstock Rd, Salisbury SP2 8BJ, UK.
Katherine M FreemanDepartment of Psychological Sciences, School of Psychology, University of East London, Stratford Campus, London E15 4LZ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At the Stollery Children’s Chronic Pain Clinic, new referrals are assessed by an interdisciplinary team. The final part of the intake assessment typically involves an explanation and compassionate validation of the etiology of chronic pain and an invitation to the youth to attend the group outpatient Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) program, called Pain 101, or to individual outpatient CBT. It was hypothesized that a brief physician-delivered CBT (brief-CBT) intervention at first point of contact improves subsequent pain acceptance. Using a randomized double blinded methodology, 26 participants received a standard intake assessment and 26 the standard assessment plus the brief-CBT intervention. Measures were taken at three points: pre and post-intake assessment and after Pain 101 or individual CBT (or day 30 post-assessment for those attending neither). The primary outcome measure was the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire—Adolescent version (CPAQ-A). Comparing pre and post-intake measures, there was a significant (p = 0.002) increase in the CPAQ-A scores—four-fold more in the brief-CBT intervention group (p = 0.045). Anxiety (RCADS-T Score) was significantly reduced post-intake and significantly more reduced in the intervention group compared to the control group (p = 0.024). CPAQ-A scores were significantly increased (p < 0.001) (N = 28) and anxiety (RCADs-T) was significantly reduced by the end of Pain 101 (p < 0.003) (N = 29) as was fear of pain as measured by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (p = 0.021). A physician-delivered brief-CBT intervention significantly and meaningfully increased CPAQ-A scores and reduced anxiety in youth with chronic pain. Furthermore, CBT through Pain 101 is effective at increasing acceptance, as well as reducing anxiety and fear of movement.

Indexed as

adolescentanxietychronic paincognitive therapycompassion

Identifiers

PMID36138601
PMCPMC9497203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.