ArticleThe Medico-legal journal2022
The costs of avoidable injury from childhood cancer: Litigate or mediate?
Article in The Medico-legal journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical presentation of bone tumours in children and young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Archives of disease in childhood · 2025Pooled it
- A new era for optic pathway glioma: A developmental brain tumor with life-long health consequences.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Review
- Childhood brain tumors: It is the child's brain that really matters.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We write as experienced paediatric practitioners who have been involved in medico-legal proceedings where cases related to childhood cancer practice have featured frequently. We will use the service evaluation of Professor David A Walker's last 35 cases, where all but seven concerned children with tumours of the brain or spine to illustrate the concerns that families raise. We refer to the evidence from the HeadSmart programme (www.headsmart.org.uk), which seeks to accelerate diagnosis by raising awareness of the disease and symptoms. We use the experience of Dr Jonathan AG Punt to illustrate the legal issues that apply and explain the way that significant quantum calculations are applied to cases of this type. The current move by NHS Resolution to explore the expanded role of mediation will be discussed and the need for research to explore the precise way that mediation could be developed to offer an alternative approach to conflict resolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.