ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2022
A novel dynamic Bayesian network approach for data mining and survival data analysis.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Causal inference in the diagnosis and prognosis of ovarian cancer: current state and future directions.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025Pooled it
- Cervical cancer survival prediction by machine learning algorithms: a systematic review.BMC cancer · 2023Pooled it
- Drugs Associated with Pediatric Cataracts: A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bayesian networks as prognostic models in oncology: a systematic review and recommendations for clinical practice.BMJ oncology · 2026Article
- Comprehensive review of Bayesian network applications in gastrointestinal cancers.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCensorship is the primary challenge in survival modeling, especially in human health studies. The classical methods have been limited by applications like Kaplan-Meier or restricted assumptions like the Cox regression model. On the other hand, Machine learning algorithms commonly rely on the high dimensionality of data and ignore the censorship attribute. In addition, these algorithms are more sophisticated to understand and utilize. We propose a novel approach based on the Bayesian network to address these issues.
methodsWe proposed a two-slice temporal Bayesian network model for the survival data, introducing the survival and censorship status in each observed time as the dynamic states. A score-based algorithm learned the structure of the directed acyclic graph. The likelihood approach conducted parameter learning. We conducted a simulation study to assess the performance of our model in comparison with the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression. We defined various scenarios according to the sample size, censoring rate, and shapes of survival and censoring distributions across time. Finally, we fit the model on a real-world dataset that includes 760 post gastrectomy surgery due to gastric cancer. The validation of the model was explored using the hold-out technique based on the posterior classification error. Our survival model performance results were compared using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models.
resultsThe simulation study shows the superiority of DBN in bias reduction for many scenarios compared with Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier, especially in the late survival times. In the real-world data, the structure of the dynamic Bayesian network model satisfied the finding from Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression classical approaches. The posterior classification error found from the validation technique did not exceed 0.04, representing that our network predicted the state variables with more than 96% accuracy.
conclusionsOur proposed dynamic Bayesian network model could be used as a data mining technique in the context of survival data analysis. The advantages of this approach are feature selection ability, straightforward interpretation, handling of high-dimensional data, and few assumptions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.