ArticleCJEM2022
Interprofessional clinical event debriefing-does it make a difference? Attitudes of emergency department care providers to INFO clinical event debriefings.
Article in CJEM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Supporting emergency departments workers well-being: a systematic review of the literature on interventions.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Interventions to reduce burnout in emergency medicine: a national inventory of the Canadian experience to support global implementation of wellness initiatives.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Transfer of clinical debriefing from simulation to practice: exploring the barriers and enablers.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Clinical team debriefing post-critical events: perceptions, benefits, and barriers among learners.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Multidisciplinary Timely Debrief Sessions after Cardiac Arrests and Endotracheal Intubations in the Pediatric Emergency Department.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDebriefing is increasingly used in clinical environments. Surveys indicate staff support for debriefing clinical events, but little is known about the specific effects of debriefing on healthcare workers in the workplace. INFO (Immediate, Not for personal assessment, Fast facilitated feedback, and Opportunity to support and ask questions) is a charge nurse facilitated clinical event debriefing program implemented in 2016 and currently used in five Emergency Departments (ED) in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. There have been more than 840 documented INFO debriefings.
methodsThirty interprofessional ED healthcare workers were recruited through posters and email to take part in voluntary one-on-one interviews using a standardized question script that asked participants about their experience with INFO debriefing assessments. Specifically, participants were asked to provide demographic information, give feedback about their involvement in INFO clinical debriefings, impact of debriefings on their clinical practice, stress levels and wellbeing. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using NVivo software.
resultsForty-five healthcare workers replied to the initial recruitment methods with fifteen not responding to follow-up communication. Overall, staff satisfaction with INFO debriefing was highly rated. A qualitative thematic analysis to saturation approach was used to analyse the data. Five main themes were identified: 1.Effect of debriefing on clinical practice and patient care. 2. Psychological safety and teamwork. 3. Emotional acknowledgment after critical events. 4. Managing work stress in the ED. 5. Barriers to debriefing.
conclusionsIn this study, debriefing in the ED helped interprofessional healthcare workers manage stress, provide improved patient care and teamwork while acknowledging emotions. This study specifically involved INFO, however, there are similarities that make our findings applicable to other clinical event debriefing programs. We believe this study provides further evidence supporting debriefing in clinical care areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36138325What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.