Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36138279›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2022

Electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-PROMs) in palliative cancer care: a scoping review.

Letteria Consolo, Greta Castellini, Silvia Cilluffo, Ilaria Basile, Maura Lusignani

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effectiveness of ePRO-based symptom management for cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Identify Mobility Limitation in Incurable Cancer.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Adherence to daily electronic symptom screening in pediatric cancer: associations with time, location and pain.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  20. Wellbeing status and priority concerns of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: results of the EONS PROMs project international online survey.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Letteria ConsoloDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy. letteria.consolo@unimi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7207-2586
Greta CastelliniUnit of Clinical Epidemiology, IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopaedic Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3345-8187
Silvia CilluffoBachelor School of Nursing, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, University, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2756-9929
Ilaria BasilePalliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation Unit, IRCCS, National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9033-9934
Maura LusignaniAssociate Professor, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5389-9879

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn palliative oncology settings, electronic patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment can play an important role in supporting clinical activities for clinicians and patients. This scoping review aims to map the technological innovation of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (e-PROMs) in cancer palliative care and how PRO data collected through e-PROMs can influence the monitoring and management of symptoms and enable better communication between health professionals and patients.

methodsA scoping review study was designed according to the Arksey and O'Malley framework. Medline, Embase, Web of Science, SCOPUS, PsycINFO and CINAHL and gray literature sources were consulted. The inclusion criteria were people over 18 years old receiving palliative and/or end-of-life care using e-PROMs.

resultsThirteen primary studies were included: nine quantitative studies, two qualitative studies, and two mixed-method studies. The recently developed software that supports e-PROMs allows patients to receive feedback on their symptoms, helps clinicians prioritize care needs and monitors patients' conditions as their symptoms change. Electronic PRO data prompt difficult, end-of-life communication between clinicians and patients to better organize care in the last phase of life.

conclusionThis work shows that electronic PRO data assessment provides valuable tools for patients' well-being and the management of symptoms; only one study reported conflicting results. However, with studies lacking on how clinicians can use these tools to improve communication with patients, more research is needed.

Indexed as

CancerElectronic patient-reported outcomeEnd of lifePalliative carePROPROMsSelf-reported outcome

Identifiers

PMID36138279
PMCPMC9500127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.