Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36138161›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neurology2022

Transcranial direct current stimulation in neglect rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review.

B González-Rodriguez, N Serradell-Ribé, R Viejo-Sobera, J P Romero-Muñoz, Elena M Marron

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

B González-Rodriguez *Brain Damage Unit, Beata María Ana Hospital, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6317-6826
N Serradell-Ribé *Faculty of Health Sciences, Cognitive NeuroLab, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Madrid, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7572-2476
R Viejo-SoberaFaculty of Health Sciences, Cognitive NeuroLab, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Madrid, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4672-1906
J P Romero-MuñozBrain Damage Unit, Beata María Ana Hospital, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3190-1296
Elena M MarronFaculty of Health Sciences, Cognitive NeuroLab, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Madrid, Barcelona, Spain. emunozmarr@uoc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1978-2826
Universitat Oberta de Catalunya · ESUniversidad Francisco de Vitoria · ESUniversidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemispatial neglect is one of the most frequent attention disorders after stroke. The presence of neglect is associated with longer hospital stays, extended rehabilitation periods, and poorer functional recovery. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a new technique with promising results in neglect rehabilitation; therefore, the objective of this systematic review, performed following the PRISMA guidelines, is to evaluate the effectiveness of tDCS on neglect recovery after stroke. The search was done in MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and BioMed Central databases. A total of 311 articles were found; only 11 met the inclusion criteria, including 152 post-stroke patients in total. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed for all the studies, and methodological characteristics of the studies, sample sizes, methods, main results, and other relevant data were extracted. tDCS intervention ranged from one to twenty sessions distributed in 1 day to 4 weeks, with intensity ranged from 1 to 2 mA. We found moderate evidence for the efficacy of tDCS in the rehabilitation of hemispatial neglect after a stroke, being more effective in combination with other interventions. Nonetheless, the limited number of studies and some studies' design characteristics makes it risky to draw categorical conclusions. Since scientific evidence is still scarce, further research is needed to determine the advantage of this treatment in acute, sub-acute and chronic stroke patients. Future studies should include larger samples, longer follow-ups, and broader neurophysiological assessments, with the final aim of establishing the appropriate use of tDCS as an adjuvant intervention in neurorehabilitation settings.

Indexed as

Perceptual DisordersStrokeStroke RehabilitationTranscranial Direct Current StimulationHumansRecovery of FunctionNeglectNon-invasive brain stimulationStroketDCSTranscranial direct current stimulationTranscranial electric stimulation

Identifiers

PMID36138161
PMCPMC9618519
OpenAlexW4296806003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.