ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2023
Levels of neonatal care among birth facilities in 20 states and other jurisdictions: CDC levels of care assessment tool
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Level III neonatal intensive care unit heterogeneity in patients, services, and outcomes.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
- Operationalizing risk-appropriate perinatal care in a rural US State: directions for policy and practice.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Maternal and neonatal risk-appropriate care: gaps, strategies, and areas for further research.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023Review
- Critical care among newborns with and without a COVID-19 diagnosis, May 2020-February 2022.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDescribe discrepancies between facilities' self-reported level of neonatal care and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Levels of Care Assessment Tool STUDY
designCDC LOCATe
resultAmong 721 facilities that self-reported level of neonatal care, 33.1% had discrepancies between their self-reported level and their LOCATe
conclusionResults highlight opportunities for jurisdictions to engage with facilities, health systems, and partners about levels of neonatal care, and to collaborate to promote standardized systems of risk-appropriate care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.