ArticleScientific reports2022
A pipeline for automated deep learning liver segmentation (PADLLS) from contrast enhanced CT exams.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Multi-Model, Pixel-Native Framework for Automated Computed Tomography Series Labeling and Characterization: Proof-of-Concept Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Topogram-based anatomical labelling of CT series: anatomy-aware CT data processing using deep learning.European radiology · 2026Article
- Federated learning-based CT liver tumor detection using a teacher‒student SANet with semisupervised learning.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Systematic Review: AI Applications in Liver Imaging with a Focus on Segmentation and Detection.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Adaptive Evolutionary Optimization of Deep Learning Architectures for Focused Liver Ultrasound Image Segmentation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Liver Segmentation Protocol Enables More Consistent and Robust Annotations, Paving the Way for Advanced Computer-Assisted Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Review of Advancements and Challenges in Liver Segmentation.Journal of imaging · 2024Review
- Evaluation of manual and automated approaches for segmentation and extraction of quantitative indices from [Biomedical physics & engineering express · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence techniques in liver cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Automatic segmentation of large-scale CT image datasets for detailed body composition analysis.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple studies have created state-of-the-art liver segmentation models using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (DCNNs) such as the V-net and H-DenseUnet. Oversegmentation however continues to be a problem. We set forth to address these limitations by developing a an automated workflow that leverages the strengths of different DCNN architectures, resulting in a pipeline that enables fully automated liver segmentation. A Pipeline for Automated Deep Learning Liver Segmentation (PADLLS) was developed and implemented that cascades multiple DCNNs that were trained on more than 200 CT scans. First, a V-net is used to create a rough liver, spleen, and stomach mask. After stomach and spleen pixels are removed using their respective masks and ascites is removed using a morphological algorithm, the scan is passed to a H-DenseUnet to yield the final segmentation. The segmentation accuracy of the pipleline was compared to the H-DenseUnet and the V-net using the SLIVER07 and 3DIRCADb datasets as benchmarks. The PADLLS Dice score for the SLIVER07 dataset was calculated to be 0.957 ± 0.033 and was significantly better than the H-DenseUnet's score of 0.927 ± 0.044 (p = 0.0219) and the V-net's score of 0.872 ± 0.121 (p = 0.0067). The PADLLS Dice score for the 3DIRCADb dataset was 0.965 ± 0.016 and was significantly better than the H-DenseUnet's score of 0.930 ± 0.041 (p = 0.0014) the V-net's score of 0.874 ± 0.060 (p < 0.001). In conclusion, our pipeline (PADLLS) outperforms existing liver segmentation models, serves as a valuable tool for image-based analysis, and is freely available for download and use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.