Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36138007›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Context-dependent selectivity to natural images in the retina.

Matías A Goldin, Baptiste Lefebvre, Samuele Virgili, Mathieu Kim Pham Van Cang, Alexander Ecker, Thierry Mora, Ulisse Ferrari, Olivier Marre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Natural motion statistics unify direction computations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Origin and functional impact of early nonlinearities in primate retina.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Stimulus-invariant aspects of the retinal code drive discriminability of natural scenes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Scalable Gaussian process inference of neural responses to natural images.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Matías A Goldin *Institut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France. matias.goldin@inserm.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-5151-3637
Baptiste Lefebvre *Institut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France.
Samuele Virgili *Institut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1693-4580
Mathieu Kim Pham Van CangInstitut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France.
Alexander EckerInstitute of Computer Science and Campus Institute Data Science, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2392-5105
Thierry MoraLaboratoire de physique de l'Ecole normale supérieure, CNRS, PSL University, Sorbonne University, and University of Paris, Paris, France.
Ulisse FerrariInstitut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3131-5537
Olivier MarreInstitut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France. olivier.marre@inserm.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-0090-6190

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retina ganglion cells extract specific features from natural scenes and send this information to the brain. In particular, they respond to local light increase (ON responses), and/or decrease (OFF). However, it is unclear if this ON-OFF selectivity, characterized with synthetic stimuli, is maintained under natural scene stimulation. Here we recorded ganglion cell responses to natural images slightly perturbed by random noise patterns to determine their selectivity during natural stimulation. The ON-OFF selectivity strongly depended on the specific image. A single ganglion cell can signal luminance increase for one image, and luminance decrease for another. Modeling and experiments showed that this resulted from the non-linear combination of different retinal pathways. Despite the versatility of the ON-OFF selectivity, a systematic analysis demonstrated that contrast was reliably encoded in these responses. Our perturbative approach uncovered the selectivity of retinal ganglion cells to more complex features than initially thought.

Indexed as

RetinaRetinal Ganglion CellsPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID36138007
PMCPMC9499945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.