Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36137900›Full record

Trial reportVaccine2022

Can financial incentives and other nudges increase COVID-19 vaccinations among the vaccine hesitant? A randomized trial.

Mireille Jacobson, Tom Y Chang, Manisha Shah, Rajiv Pramanik, Samir B Shah

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Vaccine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Teacher vaccinations enhance student achievement in Pakistan: The role of role models and theory of mind.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Reminders, but not monetary incentives, increase COVID-19 booster uptake.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Healthcare Appointments as Commitment Devices.Economic journal (London, England) · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mireille JacobsonLeonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California & NBER, 3715 McClintock Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90230, United States; Leonard Schaeffer Center for Health Policy & Economics, University of Southern California, United States. Electronic address: mireillj@usc.edu.
Tom Y ChangMarshall School of Business, University of Southern California, United States.
Manisha ShahDepartment of Public Policy, University of California, Los Angeles & NBER, United States.
Rajiv PramanikContra Costa Regional Medical Center & Health Centers, Contra Costa Health Services, United States.
Samir B ShahContra Costa Regional Medical Center & Health Centers, Contra Costa Health Services, United States.

Funding

Pilot CoreP30AG034532 · NIA · NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH · PI Marcella Alsan, JOSEPH J DOYLE · 2009 to 2026
$10.2M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG034532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite rapid initial uptake, COVID-19 vaccinations in the United States stalled within a few months of widespread rollout in 2021. In response, many state and local governments, employers and health systems used public health messaging, financial incentives and creative scheduling tools to increase vaccine uptake. Although these approaches drew on evidence from influenza and other vaccination efforts, they were largely untested in the context of SARS-CoV-2. In mid-2021, months after vaccines were widely available, we evaluated vaccination intentions and vaccine uptake using a randomized control trial. To do this, we recruited unvaccinated members of a Medicaid managed care plan in California (n = 2,701) and randomly assigned them to different public health messages, $10 or $50 financial incentives for vaccination, a simple vaccination appointment scheduler, or control. While messages increased vaccination intentions, none of the interventions increased vaccination rates. Estimates for financial incentives rule out even relatively small increases in vaccination rates. Small financial incentives and other behavioral nudges do not meaningfully increase COVID-19 vaccination rates amongst the vaccine hesitant.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza VaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansMotivationSARS-CoV-2United StatesVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesInfluenza VaccinesCOVID-19 vaccinationFinancial incentivesPublic health messagesVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36137900
PMCPMC9424519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.