Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36137619›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Three birds with one stone: a protocol for a randomised intervention study to increase participation in cervical and colorectal cancer screening among women attending breast cancer screening.

Anne Dorte Lerche Helgestad, Mette Bach Larsen, Sisse Njor, Mette Tranberg, Lone Kjeld Petersen, Berit Andersen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05022511 (Three Birds With One Stone), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05022511 nacompletednot on this map

Three Birds With One Stone: a Randomised Intervention Study to Increase Participation in Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Women Attending Breast Cancer Screening

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2021 to 2023Enrolled27,099ConditionsUterine Cervical Cancer, Uterine Cervix Cancer, Uterine Cervical Neoplasm, Colorectal NeoplasmsArmsScreening status
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anne Dorte Lerche HelgestadUniversity Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark annesper@rm.dk.ORCID 0000-0003-2099-3911
Mette Bach LarsenUniversity Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0727-5571
Sisse NjorUniversity Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.
Mette TranbergUniversity Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6285-6694
Lone Kjeld PetersenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1424-6170
Berit AndersenUniversity Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DKRegional Hospital Randers · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe participation rate is higher in breast cancer screening than in cervical cancer (CCU) and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. In this cluster-randomised study, we aim to evaluate an intervention offering home-based CCU and CRC screening to women when attending breast cancer screening if they are overdue for CCU and/or CRC screening. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: On intervention days, one of the five breast cancer screening units in the Central Denmark Region will be randomly allocated to intervention, whereas the remaining units will serve as control. Women attending breast cancer screening in the intervention unit will be offered information regarding their CCU and CRC screening history, and, if overdue, they will be offered self-sampling screening kits. For CCU screening, women aged 50-64 years will be offered a vaginal self-sampling kit for human papillomavirus testing. For CRC screening, women aged 50-69 years will be offered a kit to obtain a faecal immunochemical test. Women attending the control units will receive only standard care.After the intervention, a survey will be sent to all women in the intervention and control group, asking about their experience while attending breast cancer screening.Primary outcomes will be difference in the coverage in CCU and CRC screening 6 months after intervention between the intervention and the control group, and difference in participation rates 6 months after intervention for those who were overdue for CCU and/or CRC screening at the time of the intervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The project is listed in the record of processing activities for research projects in the Central Denmark Region (R. No.: 1-16-02-217-21). According to the Danish Consolidation Act on Research Ethics Review of Health Research Project, this study was not notifiable to the Committee (R. No.: 1-10-72-1-21). The findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05022511.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsCervix UteriEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMass ScreeningRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVaginal SmearsHEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION & MANAGEMENTONCOLOGYPREVENTIVE MEDICINEPRIMARY CAREPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID36137619
PMCPMC9511607
OpenAlexW4296793895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.