Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36137301›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2022

Environmental, individual and social traits of free-ranging raccoons influence performance in cognitive testing.

Lauren A Stanton, Eli S Bridge, Joost Huizinga, Sarah Benson-Amram

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Exposure to humans and task difficulty levels affect wild raccoons (Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren A StantonDepartment of Zoology and Physiology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8171-4034
Eli S BridgeOklahoma Biological Survey, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3453-2008
Joost HuizingaOpenAI, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0877-3051
Sarah Benson-AmramDepartment of Zoology and Physiology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0147-7559
University of Wyoming · USOklahoma Biological Survey · USOpenAI (United States) · US

Funding

University of California BerkeleyUniversity of Wyoming
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive abilities, such as learning and flexibility, are hypothesized to aid behavioral adaptation to urbanization. Although growing evidence suggests that cognition may indeed facilitate persistence in urban environments, we currently lack knowledge of the cognitive abilities of many urban taxa. Recent methodological advances, including radio frequency identification (RFID), have extended automated cognitive testing into the field but have yet to be applied to a diversity of taxa. Here, we used an RFID-enabled operant conditioning device to assess the habituation, learning and cognitive flexibility of a wild population of raccoons (Procyon lotor). We examined how several biological and behavioral traits influenced participation and performance in testing. We then compared the cognitive performance of wild raccoons tested in natural conditions with that of wild-caught raccoons tested in captivity from a previous study. In natural conditions, juvenile raccoons were more likely to habituate to the testing device, but performed worse in serial reversal learning, compared with adults. We also found that docile raccoons were more likely to learn how to operate the device in natural conditions, which suggests a relationship between emotional reactivity and cognitive ability in raccoons. Although raccoons in both captive and natural conditions demonstrated rapid associative learning and flexibility, raccoons in captive conditions generally performed better, likely owing to the heightened vigilance and social interference experienced by raccoons in natural conditions. Our results have important implications for future research on urban carnivores and cognition in field settings, as well as our understanding of behavioral adaptation to urbanization and coexistence with urban wildlife.

Indexed as

Animals, WildRaccoonsAnimalsNeuropsychological TestsReversal LearningSociological FactorsCarnivoreCognitionFlexibilityLearningRFIDUrban

Identifiers

PMID36137301
PMCPMC9637273
OpenAlexW4296808074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.