Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36137121›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2022

Effects of partial penectomy for penile cancer on sexual function: A systematic review.

Eleanor Whyte, Alexandra Sutcliffe, Philip Keegan, Tom Clifford, Jamie Matu, Oliver M Shannon, Alex Griffiths

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Penile cancer treatment and sexuality: a narrative review.International journal of impotence research · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Epidemiological study of penile cancer in a northeastern state - Brazil.Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Eleanor WhyteSouth Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, United Kingdom.
Alexandra SutcliffeSouth Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, United Kingdom.
Philip KeeganSouth Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, United Kingdom.
Tom CliffordSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Science, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom.
Jamie MatuSchool of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Oliver M ShannonPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Alex GriffithsSchool of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6044-3618
Sunderland Royal Hospital · GBLeeds Beckett University · GBLoughborough University · GBNewcastle University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Penile cancer is a rare but debilitating condition, which often requires aggressive treatment. Partial penectomy is considered as a treatment option when a sufficient portion of the penile shaft can be maintained to preserve functionality. This systematic review, which followed the PRIMSA guidelines, aimed to evaluate the effects of partial penectomy for penile cancer on sexual function-the maintenance of which is often a priority in patient groups-and to identify potential factors which may moderate these effects. A systematic search of PubMed, The Cochrane Library, and Open Grey as well as MEDLINE, CINAHL and Open Dissertations via EBSCOhost was conducted from inception through to 24th March, 2022. Studies were required to include adults aged ≥18 years who had undergone partial penectomy for the treatment of penile cancer, with a quantitative measure of sexual function available pre- and post-surgery. Four eligible articles were identified for inclusion in this review, three of which reported a decrease in sexual function pre- to post-surgery across all domains of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire (erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction and overall satisfaction). Conversely, one study reported an increase in sexual function across IIEF domains, except for orgasmic function, which decreased, pre- to post-surgery. Greater penile length was associated with higher post-operative sexual function, whilst increasing age and higher anxiety levels were associated with lower post-operative sexual function levels in one study. Despite the overall drop in sexual function, many patients were still able to maintain satisfactory sex lives following partial penectomy. Given the limited research in this area and small sample sizes across studies, additional well-controlled investigations are warranted to provide further evidence on the effects of partial penectomy for penile cancer on sexual function.

Indexed as

Erectile DysfunctionPenile NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultHumansMalePenile ErectionPenisQuality of LifeSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36137121
PMCPMC9499284
OpenAlexW4296801797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.