Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36137090›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2022

Attention and social communication skills of very preterm infants after training attention control: Bayesian analyses of a feasibility study.

Oliver Perra, Fiona Alderdice, David Sweet, Alison McNulty, Matthew Johnston, Delfina Bilello, Kostas Papageorgiou, Sam Wass

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03896490 (A Feasibility Study of the Attention Control Training), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03896490 nacompletednot on this map

A Feasibility Study of the Attention Control Training (ACT) Intervention Among Very Preterm (VP) Infants

TypeinterventionalSponsorQueen's University, BelfastRan2018 to 2020Enrolled12ConditionsVery Premature BabyArmsAttention Control Training, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Oliver PerraSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, MBC, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8675-3171
Fiona AlderdiceSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, MBC, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
David SweetHealth and Social Care Belfast Trust, A Floor, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Alison McNultyTinyLife, The Premature Baby Charity for Northern Ireland, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Matthew JohnstonSchool of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Delfina BilelloInstitute of Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Kostas PapageorgiouSchool of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Sam WassSchool of Psychology, University of East London, London, United Kingdom.
Queen's University Belfast · GBBelfast Health and Social Care Trust · GBInstitute of Mental Health · GBUniversity of East London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVery preterm (VP) infants (born 28 to <32 weeks of gestation) are at risk of cognitive delays and lower educational attainments. These risks are linked to anomalies in attention and information processing that emerge in the first years of life. Early interventions targeting attention functioning may equip VP infants with key building blocks for later attainments.

methodsWe tested the feasibility of a randomised trial where VP infants took part in a computerised cognitive procedure to train attention control. Ten healthy VP infants aged approximately 12 months (corrected age) and randomly allocated with 1:1 ratio to the training (interactive computerised presentations) or an active control procedure completed the study. Before and after the training programme, participating infants completed a battery of screen-based attention tests, naturalistic attention and communication tasks, and temperament assessments. In a previous study we analysed the data concerning feasibility (e.g. recruitment and retention). In the paper presented here we considered the infants' performance and used Bayesian regression in order to provide credible treatment estimates considering the data collected.

resultsEstimates indicate moderate treatment effects in visual memory: compared to controls, trained infants displayed improvements equivalent to 0.59 SD units. Trained infants also improved in their abilities to attend to less salient stimuli presentations by 0.82 SD units, compared to controls. However, results did not indicate relevant gains in attention habituation or disengagement. We also reported moderate improvements in focused attention during naturalistic tasks, and in directing other people's attention to shared objects. DISCUSSION: The results warrant further investigation concerning the effectiveness of training attention control in VP infants, extending this line of research beyond our small and homogeneous sample of healthy VP infants. This study also emphasises the utility of Bayesian approaches in estimating potentially relevant effects in small samples or exploratory studies. The scope for further research on early attention control training is discussed in light of studies indicating VP children's susceptibility to positive environmental inputs.

trial registrationRegistration ID: NCT03896490. Retrospectively registered at Clinical Trials Protocol Registration and Results System (clinicaltrials.gov).

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesBayes TheoremChildCommunicationFeasibility StudiesHumansInfantInfant, Newborn

Identifiers

PMID36137090
PMCPMC9499320
OpenAlexW4296796064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.