Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36136999›Full record

SynthesisEcology letters2022

A global meta-analysis reveals higher variation in breeding phenology in urban birds than in their non-urban neighbours.

Pablo Capilla-Lasheras, Megan J Thompson, Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar, Yacob Haddou, Claire J Branston, Denis Réale, Anne Charmantier, Davide M Dominoni

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Ecology letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Pablo Capilla-LasherasSchool of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6091-7089
Megan J ThompsonDépartement des Sciences Biologiques, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0279-5340
Alfredo Sánchez-TójarDepartment of Evolutionary Biology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2886-0649
Yacob HaddouSchool of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0557-0339
Claire J BranstonSchool of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4416-0984
Denis RéaleDépartement des Sciences Biologiques, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0419-7125
Anne CharmantierCentre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Davide M DominoniSchool of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2063-9955
University of Glasgow · GBCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRBielefeld University · DEUniversité du Québec à Montréal · CA

Funding

Natural Environment Research Council NE/S005773/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cities pose a major ecological challenge for wildlife worldwide. Phenotypic variation, which can result from underlying genetic variation or plasticity, is an important metric to understand eco-evolutionary responses to environmental change. Recent work suggests that urban populations might have higher levels of phenotypic variation than non-urban counterparts. This prediction, however, has never been tested across species nor over a broad geographical range. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis of the avian literature to compare urban versus non-urban means and variation in phenology (i.e. lay date) and reproductive effort (i.e. clutch size, number of fledglings). First, we show that urban populations reproduce earlier and have smaller broods than non-urban conspecifics. Second, we show that urban populations have higher phenotypic variation in laying date than non-urban populations. This result arises from differences between populations within breeding seasons, conceivably due to higher landscape heterogeneity in urban habitats. These findings reveal a novel effect of urbanisation on animal life histories with potential implications for species adaptation to urban environments (which will require further investigation). The higher variation in phenology in birds subjected to urban disturbance could result from plastic responses to a heterogeneous environment, or from higher genetic variation in phenology, possibly linked to higher evolutionary potential.

Indexed as

BirdsReproductionAnimalsCitiesClutch SizeSeasonsglobal changehabitat heterogeneitylife-history traitsmeta-analysisphenotypic variationsynthesisurban ecologyurbanisation

Identifiers

PMID36136999
PMCPMC9826320
OpenAlexW4296741004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.