Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36136979›Full record

ReviewPLoS pathogens2022

Human monkeypox: A review of the literature.

Rozana El Eid, Fatima Allaw, Sara F Haddad, Souha S Kanj

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS pathogens, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Mpox Airborne Transmission: A Systematic Review.Reviews in medical virology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Severe mpox in an immunocompromised, non-traveller South African male.Southern African journal of infectious diseases · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Colliding Pandemics and CoViD-19.Bioinformation · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rozana El EidDivision of Infectious Diseases, Internal Medicine Department, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Fatima AllawDivision of Infectious Diseases, Internal Medicine Department, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Sara F HaddadDivision of Infectious Diseases, Internal Medicine Department, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Souha S KanjDivision of Infectious Diseases, Internal Medicine Department, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID 0000-0001-6413-3396

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monkeypox (MPX) has recently made international headlines for the rapid and simultaneous progression of the disease across the world. This review aims at summarizing the literature available as well as describing the evolution of the disease as it pertains to the cases today along with potential treatments and infection control strategies. To date, more than 76 countries have reported cases in more than 12,261 people. Before this, MPX was a rare zoonotic disease confined to endemic areas in Western and Central Africa with sporadic outbreaks namely in the United States, associated with the import of wild animals from Ghana. However, during the current outbreak, human-to-human transmission has become the primary mode of transmission, raising concerns for unaccounted community spread. Most of these patients did not travel to the endemic areas of Africa, suggesting possible previously underdetected community transmission. Observations from emergent cases have reported that the manifestations of the disease were sometimes atypical from what has been previously described. Young men who have sex with men seem to be the population most vulnerable to infection. Though the disease is currently perceived to be mild in its clinical course, questions that remain unclear and warrant further investigation include potential of humans harboring a genital reservoir of the virus and the possibility of airborne transmission, which has implications for infection control and health of the community at large.

Indexed as

Mpox, MonkeypoxSexual and Gender MinoritiesAfrica, CentralAnimalsHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMonkeypox virus

Identifiers

PMID36136979
PMCPMC9498972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.