Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36136846›Full record

ArticlePharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Designing an Inclusive Learning Training Series for Pharmacy Educators.

Jacqueline E McLaughlin, Kathryn A Morbitzer, Bethany Volkmar, Suzanne C Harris, Charlene R Williams, Michael D Wolcott, Michael B Jarstfer, Carla Y White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jacqueline E McLaughlinUNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9161-8441
Kathryn A MorbitzerUNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Bethany VolkmarUNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Suzanne C HarrisUNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1751-4732
Charlene R WilliamsUNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5907-2661
Michael D WolcottWorkman School of Dental Medicine, High Point University, High Point, NC 27268, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3254-3643
Michael B JarstferUNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4428-4626
Carla Y WhiteUNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article describes the design, implementation, and evaluation of five faculty development sessions focused on inclusive teaching strategies in pharmacy education. Inclusive strategies ensure that every student can clearly understand and engage in meaningful learning opportunities. Three sessions were implemented in fall 2020 and two in spring 2021. Sessions focused on experiential, didactic, and graduate education. A convergent parallel mixed methods evaluation was conducted using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Sessions were highly rated, and participants provided suggestions for curriculum improvement (e.g., creating resources, surveying students, and peer auditing syllabi for aspects of inclusiveness). Given the increasing emphasis on inclusion in pharmacy education, this work is timely for sharing strategies aimed at faculty development and teaching practices.

Indexed as

diversityevaluationfaculty developmentinclusive teaching

Identifiers

PMID36136846
PMCPMC9498629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.