Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36136379›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2022

Psychometric Properties of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in Individuals With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Protocol for a Systematic Review.

Aleksandra Nikolovski, Lara Gamgoum, Arshpreet Deol, Shea Quilichini, Ethan Kazemir, Jonathan Rhodenizer, Ana Oliveira, Dina Brooks, Sanaa Alsubheen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Aleksandra NikolovskiSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7830-7406
Lara GamgoumSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6033-2929
Arshpreet DeolSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4151-4417
Shea QuilichiniSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9432-576X
Ethan KazemirSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9522-1137
Jonathan RhodenizerSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6207-3246
Ana OliveiraSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4516-6904
Dina BrooksSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6080-5052
Sanaa AlsubheenSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9841-7522
McMaster University · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAWest Park Healthcare Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety and depression contribute to increased mortality and exacerbations, decreased physical functioning, and deteriorated health-related quality of life. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a patient-reported tool developed to measure symptoms of anxiety and depression in clinical settings. The HADS has been frequently used with individuals with COPD; however, its measurement properties lack critical appraisal in this population.

objectiveThis review aims to summarize and critically appraise the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the HADS in individuals with COPD.

methodsFive electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, PsychINFO, and Web of Science) will be systematically searched. Articles will be included if they assessed the measurement properties of the HADS in COPD; were published in a peer-reviewed journal; and were written in English. The COSMIN (Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments) guidelines will be used to assess the methodological quality and level of evidence in the selected studies.

resultsTo date, 12 articles met the inclusion criteria and will be included in the systematic review. The results of the psychometric properties of HADS will be qualitatively summarized and compared against the criteria for good measurement properties. The overall quality of evidence will be graded using the modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. We expect to complete the systematic review by December 2022.

conclusionsThis systematic review will be the first to evaluate the psychometric properties of the HADS in individuals with COPD. Given the negative impact of anxiety and depression on physical functioning and health-related quality of life, this systematic review provides an opportunity to use the HADS as a validated measurement tool for the assessment and treatment of anxiety and depression in individuals with COPD.

trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42022302064; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=302064. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/37854.

Indexed as

anxietyCOPDdatabasedepressionfunctioningHADSmental healthmortalityprotocolpulmonaryquality of lifereliabilityresponsivenesssymptomssystematic reviewtoolvalidity

Identifiers

PMID36136379
PMCPMC9539646
OpenAlexW4288858473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.