Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36136377›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2022

Feasibility and Acceptability of Music Imagery and Listening Interventions for Analgesia: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Kristin M Story, Dawn M Bravata, Sheri L Robb, Sally Wasmuth, James E Slaven, Leah Whitmire, Barry Barker, Tetla Menen, Matthew J Bair

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05426941 (Feasibility and Acceptability of Music Imagery, and Listening Interventions for Analgesia), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05426941 naunknown statusnot on this map

Feasibility and Acceptability of Music Imagery, and Listening Interventions for Analgesia (FAMILIA)

TypeinterventionalSponsorHenry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military MedicineRan2021 to 2023Enrolled60ConditionsChronic PainArmsMusic Imagery, Music Listening
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Kristin M Story *Center for Health Information and Communication (CHIC), Health Services Research & Development (HSRD), Richard L Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2110-5496
Dawn M Bravata *Center for Health Information and Communication (CHIC), Health Services Research & Development (HSRD), Richard L Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3048-2536
Sheri L Robb *Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8499-0934
Sally Wasmuth *Department of Occupational Therapy, Indiana University School of Health and Human Sciences, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1431-3687
James E Slaven *Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6744-3821
Leah Whitmire *Creative Forces, National Endowment for the Arts, Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine Inc, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0075-7172
Barry Barker *Center for Health Information and Communication (CHIC), Health Services Research & Development (HSRD), Richard L Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9291-216X
Tetla Menen *Center for Health Information and Communication (CHIC), Health Services Research & Development (HSRD), Richard L Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7832-7095
Matthew J Bair *Center for Health Information and Communication (CHIC), Health Services Research & Development (HSRD), Richard L Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6374-1370
Health Services Research & Development · USRegenstrief Institute · USHenry M. Jackson Foundation · USIndiana University Health · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University School of Medicine

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic pain and access to care are identified as critical needs of the Veterans Health Administration. Music imagery and music listening interventions have shown promise as effective nonpharmacological options for pain management. However, most studies have focused on acute pain, passive music experiences, and in-person delivery.

objectiveIn this study, we aimed to examine the feasibility and acceptability of 2 music interventions delivered through telehealth for chronic musculoskeletal pain, trial design, and theoretical model before conducting a fully powered efficacy or comparative effectiveness trial.

methodsFAMILIA (Feasibility and Acceptability of Music Imagery and Listening Interventions for Analgesia) is a 3-arm, parallel group, pilot trial. A total of 60 veterans will be randomized to one of the three conditions: music imagery, music listening, or usual care. Aim 1 is to test the feasibility and acceptability of a multicomponent, interactive music imagery intervention (8-weekly, individual sessions) and a single-component, minimally interactive music learning intervention (independent music listening). Feasibility metrics related to recruitment, retention, engagement, and completion of the treatment protocol and questionnaires will be assessed. Up to 20 qualitative interviews will be conducted to assess veteran experiences with both interventions, including perceived benefits, acceptability, barriers, and facilitators. Interview transcripts will be coded and analyzed for emergent themes. Aim 2 is to explore the effects of music imagery and music listening versus usual care on pain and associated patient-centered outcomes. These outcomes and potential mediators will be explored through changes from baseline to follow-up assessments at 1, 3, and 4 months. Descriptive statistics will be used to describe outcomes; this pilot study is not powered to detect differences in outcomes.

resultsRecruitment for FAMILIA began in March 2022, and as of July 2022, 16 participants have been enrolled. We anticipate that enrollment will be completed by May 2023. We expect that music imagery and music listening will prove acceptable to veterans and that feasibility benchmarks will be reached. We hypothesize that music imagery and music listening will be more effective than usual care on pain and related outcomes.

conclusionsFAMILIA addresses four limitations in music intervention research for chronic pain: limited studies in veterans, evaluation of a multicomponent music intervention, methodological rigor, and internet-based delivery. Findings from FAMILIA will inform a fully powered trial to identify putative mechanisms and test efficacy.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05426941; https://tinyurl.com/3jdhx28u. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/38788.

Indexed as

acceptabilitychronic painclinical trialfeasibilitymobile phonemusic imagerymusic therapypilot studyveterans

Identifiers

PMID36136377
PMCPMC9539652
OpenAlexW4296657757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.