Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36136334›Full record

SynthesisJAMA network open2022

Association of Follow-up Blood Cultures With Mortality in Patients With Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Joshua T Thaden, Sarah Cantrell, Michael Dagher, Yazhong Tao, Felicia Ruffin, Stacey A Maskarinec, Stacy Goins, Matthew Sinclair, Joshua B Parsons, Emily Eichenberger and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Persistent Gram-negative Bloodstream Infection Increases the Risk of Recurrent Bloodstream Infection With the Same Species.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Risk factors for positive follow-up blood cultures in Gram-negative bacteremia among immunocompromised patients with neutropenia.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Joshua T ThadenDuke University Division of Infectious Diseases, Durham, North Carolina.
Sarah CantrellDuke University Medical Center Library & Archives, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Michael DagherDuke University Division of Infectious Diseases, Durham, North Carolina.
Yazhong TaoDuke University Division of Infectious Diseases, Durham, North Carolina.
Felicia RuffinDuke University Division of Infectious Diseases, Durham, North Carolina.
Stacey A MaskarinecDuke University Division of Infectious Diseases, Durham, North Carolina.
Stacy GoinsDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Matthew SinclairDuke University Division of Nephrology, Durham, North Carolina.
Joshua B ParsonsDuke University Division of Infectious Diseases, Durham, North Carolina.
Emily EichenbergerDuke University Division of Infectious Diseases, Durham, North Carolina.
Vance G FowlerDuke University Division of Infectious Diseases, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

HLA Fine Mapping to Elucidate S. aureus SusceptibilityR01AI165671 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FOWLER, VANCE G., SCOTT, WILLIAM K · 2021 to 2025
$3.8M
Characterization of a Novel E. coli Type III Secretion System Associated with Increased Patient MortalityK08AI171183 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Joshua T Thaden · 2022 to 2026
$895k
NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI171183NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI165671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Obtaining follow-up blood cultures (FUBCs) in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (BSI) is standard practice, although its utility in patients with gram-negative bacterial BSI (GN-BSI) is unclear. Objective: To examine whether obtaining FUBCs is associated with decreased mortality (key question [KQ] 1) and whether positive vs negative FUBCs are associated with increased mortality (KQ2). Data Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and gray literature were searched from inception to March 11, 2022. Study Selection: Two investigators used predefined eligibility criteria to independently screen titles, abstracts, and relevant full texts. Randomized clinical trials or observational studies that matched or statistically adjusted for differences in, at minimum, level of acute illness between patients in the intervention (eg, FUBCs obtained) and control (eg, FUBCs not obtained) groups were included in primary analyses. Articles published in languages other than English were excluded. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data abstraction and quality assessments were performed by one investigator and verified by a second investigator. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Effect sizes were pooled using random-effects models. The study followed the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) reporting guideline. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mortality before hospital discharge or up to 30 days from the index blood culture. Results: From 3495 studies, 15 were included (all nonrandomized). In the 5 studies (n = 4378 patients) that met criteria for the KQ1 primary analysis, obtaining FUBCs was associated with decreased mortality (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.45-0.71). For KQ2, 2 studies met criteria for the primary analysis (ie, matched or statistically adjusted for differences in patients with positive vs negative FUBCs), so an exploratory meta-analysis of all 9 studies that investigated KQ2 (n = 3243 patients) was performed. Positive FUBCs were associated with increased mortality relative to negative blood cultures (odds ratio, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.54-3.34). Limitations of the literature included a lack of randomized studies and few patient subgroup analyses. Conclusions and Relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, obtaining FUBCs in patients with GN-BSI was associated with decreased mortality. The benefit of FUBCs may stem from identification of patients with positive FUBCs, which was a poor prognostic marker.

Indexed as

Gram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsSepsisStaphylococcal InfectionsBlood CultureFollow-Up StudiesHumans

Identifiers

PMID36136334
PMCPMC9500561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.