SynthesisJAMA network open2022
Association of Follow-up Blood Cultures With Mortality in Patients With Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Scenario-Based Survey of Clinician Recommendations for Follow-Up Blood Cultures in Patients With Varying Risk of Persistent Gram-Negative Bacteremia.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Managing multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacteraemia in immunocompromised hosts.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2026Review
- Fulminant Aeromonas caviae bacteremia with migratory myalgia: a case report of a CTX-M-3-producing multidrug-resistant strain.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- The impact of follow-up blood cultures on mortality and management in patients with gram-negative bloodstream infections: a validation cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Pathogen characteristics are key determinants of distinct host response phenotypes of sepsis.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Observational
- Assessing the feasibility of a platform trial for Gram negative bloodstream infections: results from the vanguard phase of BALANCE.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Implementation of a Bundle for the Management of Patients With Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infection: A Pre-Post Quasi-experimental Study.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Bridging the gap in bloodstream infection management: a survey among non-infectious disease physicians.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025Article
- Infrastructure and current practice of blood culture diagnostics in patients with sepsis: teachings and recommendations from the European Sepsis Care Survey.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
- Developing a Personalized Approach to Follow-Up Blood Cultures in Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections: A Narrative Review.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Use of a rapid detection test for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase from direct blood culture: an antimicrobial stewardship tool in a tertiary hospital in Spain.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2025Article
- Observational
- Article
- Article
- Epidemiology and clinical relevance of persistent bacteraemia in patients with Gram-negative bloodstream infection: a retrospective cohort study.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2024Article
- Persistent Gram-negative Bloodstream Infection Increases the Risk of Recurrent Bloodstream Infection With the Same Species.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024Article
- Impact of a multidisciplinary management team on clinical outcome in ICU patients affected by Gram-negative bloodstream infections: a pre-post quasi-experimental study.Annals of intensive care · 2024Article
- Persistence of Detectable Pathogens by Culture-Independent Systems (T2 Magnetic Resonance) in Patients With Bloodstream Infection: Prognostic Role and Possible Clinical Implications.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024Observational
- Risk factors for positive follow-up blood cultures in Gram-negative bacteremia among immunocompromised patients with neutropenia.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society · 2024Article
- Serum Galactomannan: A Predictor of Poor Outcomes in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients With Fungal Peritonitis.Kidney international reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Obtaining follow-up blood cultures (FUBCs) in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (BSI) is standard practice, although its utility in patients with gram-negative bacterial BSI (GN-BSI) is unclear. Objective: To examine whether obtaining FUBCs is associated with decreased mortality (key question [KQ] 1) and whether positive vs negative FUBCs are associated with increased mortality (KQ2). Data Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and gray literature were searched from inception to March 11, 2022. Study Selection: Two investigators used predefined eligibility criteria to independently screen titles, abstracts, and relevant full texts. Randomized clinical trials or observational studies that matched or statistically adjusted for differences in, at minimum, level of acute illness between patients in the intervention (eg, FUBCs obtained) and control (eg, FUBCs not obtained) groups were included in primary analyses. Articles published in languages other than English were excluded. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data abstraction and quality assessments were performed by one investigator and verified by a second investigator. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Effect sizes were pooled using random-effects models. The study followed the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) reporting guideline. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mortality before hospital discharge or up to 30 days from the index blood culture. Results: From 3495 studies, 15 were included (all nonrandomized). In the 5 studies (n = 4378 patients) that met criteria for the KQ1 primary analysis, obtaining FUBCs was associated with decreased mortality (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.45-0.71). For KQ2, 2 studies met criteria for the primary analysis (ie, matched or statistically adjusted for differences in patients with positive vs negative FUBCs), so an exploratory meta-analysis of all 9 studies that investigated KQ2 (n = 3243 patients) was performed. Positive FUBCs were associated with increased mortality relative to negative blood cultures (odds ratio, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.54-3.34). Limitations of the literature included a lack of randomized studies and few patient subgroup analyses. Conclusions and Relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, obtaining FUBCs in patients with GN-BSI was associated with decreased mortality. The benefit of FUBCs may stem from identification of patients with positive FUBCs, which was a poor prognostic marker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.