ArticleNeurosurgical review2022
Exoscopic vs. microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing's disease: a retrospective single-center study on 388 patients.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pituitary adenoma consistency affects postoperative hormone function: a retrospective study.BMC endocrine disorders · 2023Article
- Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery with a Layered Peel Strategy for Cushing's Disease Treatment: A Case Series.Brain sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microscopic and endoscopic transsphenoidal surgeries represent the standard treatment for Cushing's disease (CD). At our institution a new exoscopic approach was implemented. After proof of the general use for transsphenoidal pituitary surgery, the aim of this study was to compare the exoscopic 4K3D video microscope with the microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for patients with CD. We conducted a retrospective analysis on 388 patients with CD treated in our medical center via microscopic transsphenoidal surgery (MTS) between January 2008 and July 2019 or via exoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ExTS) between May 2019 and May 2021. Parameters investigated included histology, pre- and postoperative MRI with tumor size, pre- and postoperative ACTH and cortisol levels, duration of surgery, perioperative and postoperative complications as well as clinical outcome. Patients who underwent ExTS in CD experienced a lower incidence of SIADH/diabetes insipidus (p = 0.0164), a higher rate of remission (p = 0.0422), and a shorter duration of surgery (p < 0.0001), compared to MTS. However, there was no significant difference regarding new postoperative pituitary insufficiency and intraoperative CSF space opening. We found that ExTS had multiple benefits compared to MTS for tumor resection in case of CD. These results are in line with our previous publication on the general applicability of an exoscope in pituitary surgery. To our knowledge, this is the first clinical study proving the superiority of ExTS in CD. These results are promising, nevertheless further studies comparing exoscopic with the endoscopic approach are necessary to finally evaluate the utility of the new technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.