Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36136103›Full record

SynthesisChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2022

Electroencephalogram and heart rate variability features as predictors of responsiveness to vagus nerve stimulation in patients with epilepsy: a systematic review.

Sarosh Irfan Madhani, Mehdi Abbasi, Yang Liu, Jorge Arturo Larco, Evan Nicolai, Gregory Worrell, Luis Savastano

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Surgical re-evaluation patterns among pediatric vagus nerve stimulation non-responders: a single-center retrospective study.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarosh Irfan MadhaniDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, USA. saroshirfan.madhani@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4855-8487
Mehdi AbbasiDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Yang LiuGlobal Institute of Future Technologies, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Jorge Arturo LarcoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Evan NicolaiMayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Gregory WorrellDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Luis SavastanoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a mainstay treatment in people with medically refractive epilepsy with a growing interest to identify biomarkers that are predictive of VNS efficacy. In this review, we looked at electroencephalography (EEG) and heart rate variability (HRV) parameters as potential biomarkers. METHODOLOGY: A comprehensive search of several databases limited to the English language and excluding animal studies was conducted. Data was collected from studies that specifically reviewed preoperative EEG and HRV characteristics as predictive factors of VNS outcomes.

resultsTen out of 1078 collected studies were included in this review, of which EEG characteristics were reported in seven studies; HRV parameters were reported in two studies, and one study reported both. For EEG, studies reported a lower global rate of synchronization in alpha, delta, and gamma waves as predictors of the VNS response. The P300 wave, an evoked response on EEG, had conflicting results. Two studies reported high P300 wave amplitudes in nonresponders and low amplitudes in responders, whereas another study reported high P300 wave amplitudes in responders. For HRV, one study reported high-frequency power as the only parameter to be significantly lower in responders. In contrast, two studies from the same authors showed that HRV parameters were not different between responders and nonresponders.

conclusionHRV parameters and EEG characteristics including focal seizures and P300 wave have been reported as potential biomarkers for VNS outcomes in people with medically refractive epilepsy. However, the contradictory findings imply a need for validation through clinical trials.

Indexed as

Drug Resistant EpilepsyEpilepsyVagus Nerve StimulationElectroencephalographyHeart RateHumansTreatment OutcomeEEGEpilepsyHeart ratePredictorsVariability

Identifiers

PMID36136103
OpenAlexW4296633310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.