ArticleJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)2022
Chronic moderate hypercapnia suppresses ventilatory responses to acute CO<sub>2</sub> challenges.
Article in Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mild and moderate chronic hypercapnia elicit distinct transcriptomic responses of immune function in cardiorespiratory nuclei.Physiological genomics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic hypercapnia (CH) is a hallmark of chronic lung disease, and CH increases the risk for acute-on-chronic exacerbations leading to greater hypoxemia/hypercapnia and poor health outcomes. However, the role of hypercapnia per se (duration and severity) in determining an individual's ability to tolerate further hypercapnic exacerbations is unknown. Our primary objective herein was to test the hypothesis that mild-to-moderate CH (arterial [Formula: see text] ∼50-70 mmHg) increases susceptibility to pathophysiological responses to severe acute CO<sub>2</sub> challenges. Three groups (GR) of adult female goats were studied during 14 days of exposure to room air (<i>GR 1</i>; control) or 6% inspired CO<sub>2</sub> (<i>GR 2</i>; mild CH), or 7 days of 6% inspired CO<sub>2</sub> followed by 7 days of 8% inspired CO<sub>2</sub> (<i>GR 3</i>; moderate CH). Consistent with previous reports, there were no changes in physiological parameters in <i>GR 1</i> (RA control), but mild CH (<i>GR 2</i>) increased steady-state ventilation and transiently suppressed CO<sub>2</sub>/[H<sup>+</sup>] chemosensitivity. Further increasing InCO<sub>2</sub> from 6% to 8% (<i>GR 3</i>) transiently increased ventilation and arterial [H<sup>+</sup>]. Similar to mild CH, moderate CH increased ventilation to levels greater than predicted. However, in contrast to mild CH, acute ventilatory chemosensitivity was suppressed throughout the duration of moderate CH, and the arterial - mixed expired CO<sub>2</sub> gradient became negative. These data suggest that moderate CH limits physiological responses to acute severe exacerbations and provide evidence of recruitment of extrapulmonary systems (i.e., gastric CO<sub>2</sub> elimination) during times of moderate-severe hypercapnia.<b>NEW &amp; NOTEWORTHY</b> Moderate levels of chronic hypercapnia (CH; ∼70 mmHg) in healthy adult female goats elicited similar steady-state physiological adaptations compared with mild CH (∼55 mmHg). However, unlike mild CH, moderate CH chronically suppressed acute CO<sub>2</sub>/[H<sup>+</sup>] chemosensitivity and reversed the arterial to mixed expired CO<sub>2</sub> gradient. These findings suggest that moderate CH suppresses vital mechanisms of ventilatory control and recruits additional physiological systems (i.e., gastric CO<sub>2</sub> release) to help buffer excess CO<sub>2</sub>.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.