Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36135790›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2022

A qualitative approach to experiential knowledge identified in focus groups aimed at co-designing a provocation test in the study of electrohypersensitivity.

Jimmy Bordarie, Maël Dieudonné, Maryse Ledent, Nicolas Prignot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jimmy BordarieQualipsy, EE 1901, Université de Tours, Tours, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9901-2639
Maël DieudonnéPôle de Santé Publique, Hospices Civils de Lyon/Department of Public Health, University Hospital of Lyon; Centre Max Weber, Institut des Sciences de l'Homme, Lyon, France.
Maryse LedentSciensano, Risk and Health Impact Assessment, Bruxelles & Université Libre de Bruxelles, École de Santé Publique, Brussels, Belgique.
Nicolas PrignotUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Groupe d'Études Constructivistes, Brussels, Belgique.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients' experiential knowledge is increasingly recognised as valuable for biomedical research. Its contribution can reveal unexplored aspects of their illnesses and allows research priorities to be refined according to theirs. It can also be argued that patients' experiential knowledge can contribute to biomedical research, by extending it to the most organic aspects of diseases. A few examples of collaboration between medicine and patient associations are promising, even if there is no single, simple methodology to apply. This article provides feedback on a project involving the experiential knowledge of electrohypersensitive persons with a view to developing an experimental protocol to study their condition. It presents the participatory approach with focus groups that was implemented and reflects on ways to take advantage of experiential knowledge. It also demonstrates the complexity of the electrohypersensitivity syndrome and reflects on the difficult transition between the experiential knowledge and the experimental design of provocation studies.KEY MESSAGESExperiential knowledge is a valuable source of information for research and the design of investigation protocols.The participatory approach allows co-designing protocols by drawing on experiential knowledge.The controversial dimension of EHS reveals the complexity of translating experiential knowledge into an experimental protocol.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchElectromagnetic FieldsFocus GroupsHumansContested illnesseselectromagnetic hypersensitivityfocus groupsIEI-EMFparticipatory researchpatient involvementqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID36135790
PMCPMC9518295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.