ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2022
Bond Durability of Two-Step HEMA-Free Universal Adhesive.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparison of universal adhesives used in different etching modes on dentin bond strength: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Pooled it
- HEMA-free versus HEMA-containing adhesive systems: a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Short-term clinical and micromorphological comparison of injectable and paste composites in occlusal cavities.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- 24-Month clinical evaluation of cervical restorations bonded using radio-opaque universal adhesive compared to conventional universal adhesive in carious cervical lesions: A randomized clinical trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Core Buildup Composite Resins Bond Strength to Dentin and Microhardness Using Universal Adhesives.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- The Use of Bovine Teeth as an Experimental Substrate in the Evaluation of Shear in Contemporary Adhesive Systems.Polymers · 2026Article
- Universal Adhesive Brands Functional Performance in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions: 18- to 48-Months Systematic Clinical Report.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Influence of film thickness of one and two-step universal adhesives on dentin bond strength.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Evaluation of microtensile bond strength to dentin and adhesive layer thickness of a new generation two-bottle universal adhesive.European oral research · 2026Article
- Effect of Etching Mode on the Dentin Bond Durability of Universal Adhesives.The journal of adhesive dentistry · 2025Article
- Effect of air-thinning a two-step adhesive layer on bond strength to tooth substrates.Odontology · 2025Article
- Evolution of Dental Resin Adhesives-A Comprehensive Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- The effect of different treatment protocols on shear bond strength in resin composite restoration repair.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- The efficacy of Er,Cr:YSGG laser and contemporary universal adhesive systems on composite resin repair bond strength: an in vitro study.Odontology · 2024Article
- Warm Air Delivery in Adhesive Application: Effect on Bonding Performance and Morphological Outcomes.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of Different Application Modalities on the Bond Performance of Four Polymeric Adhesive Systems to Dentin.Polymers · 2023Article
- Long-Term In Vitro Adhesive Properties of Two Universal Adhesives to Dentin.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comparison of Different Universal Adhesive Systems on Dentin Bond Strength.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to compare bond durability, in terms of fatigue bond strength, of a two-step HEMA-free universal adhesive and representative adhesives in each systematic category. The adhesives used in this study were OptiBond FL, Prime&Bond NT, Clearfil SE Bond 2, G2-Bond Universal, and Scotchbond Universal Plus Adhesive. Fatigue bond strength testing and scanning electron microscopy analysis of adhesively bonded enamel and dentin interfaces were performed. For the adhesives in etch-and-rinse mode, the enamel fatigue bond strength of the G2-Bond Universal adhesive was significantly higher than those of other adhesives, and the dentin fatigue bond strength of Prime&Bond NT was significantly lower than the others. For adhesives in self-etch mode, the enamel fatigue bond strengths of Clearfil SE Bond 2 and G2-Bond Universal were significantly higher than that of the Scotchbond Universal Plus Adhesive, and the dentin fatigue bond strength of G2-Bond Universal was significantly higher than Clearfil SE Bond 2 and the Scotchbond Universal Plus Adhesive. The two-step HEMA-free universal adhesive showed higher enamel and higher or equal dentin fatigue bond strength than other selected representative adhesive systems in etch-and-rinse mode and higher or equal enamel and higher dentin fatigue bond strength than adhesive systems in self-etch mode.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.