ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2022
Evaluation of Left Ventricular Function Using Four-Dimensional Flow Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mitral Valve Repair vs. Replacement: Hemodynamics in Valve Surgery.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Development and Initial Validation of the Novel Computational Method for Dynamic Intracardiac Blood Flow Evaluation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Impact of mitral valve interventions on left ventricular hemodynamics: Insights into energy loss and flow dynamics.JTCVS open · 2025Article
- Four-Dimensional Flow MRI for Cardiovascular Evaluation (4DCarE): A Prospective Non-Inferiority Study of a Rapid Cardiac MRI Exam: Study Protocol and Pilot Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Evaluation of left ventricular blood flow kinetic energy in patients with acute myocardial infarction by 4D Flow MRI: a preliminary study.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Evaluation of left ventricular and left atrial volumetric function from native MR multislice 4D flow magnitude data.European radiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is increasing recognition of the value of four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (4D-flow MRI) as a potential means to detect and measure abnormal flow behaviour that occurs during early left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. We performed a systematic review of current literature on the role of 4D-flow MRI-derived flow parameters in quantification of LV function with a focus on potential clinical applicability. A comprehensive literature search was performed in March 2022 on available databases. A total of 1186 articles were identified, and 30 articles were included in the final analysis. All the included studies were ranked as "highly clinically applicable". There was considerable variability in the reporting of methodologies and analyses. All the studies were small-scale feasibility or pilot studies investigating a diverse range of flow parameters. The most common primary topics of investigation were energy-related flow parameters, flow components and vortex analysis which demonstrated potentials for quantifying early diastolic dysfunction, whilst other parameters including haemodynamic forces, residence time distribution and turbulent kinetic energy remain in need of further evaluation. Systematic quantitative comparison of study findings was not possible due to this heterogeneity, therefore limiting the collective power of the studies in evaluating clinical applicability of the flow parameters. To achieve broader clinical application of 4D-flow MRI, larger scale investigations are required, together with standardisation of methodologies and analytical approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.