Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36135092›Full record

SynthesisCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2022

Efficacy and Safety of the Addition of Internal Mammary Irradiation to Standard Adjuvant Radiation in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Yasmin Korzets, Dina Levitas, Ahuva Grubstein, Benjamin W Corn, Eitan Amir, Hadar Goldvaser

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The Coming of Age of Breast Radiotherapy.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yasmin KorzetsInstitute of Oncology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Weizmann St. 6, Tel-Aviv 6423906, Israel.
Dina LevitasOncology Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Shmuel Bait St. 12, Jerusalem 9103102, Israel.
Ahuva GrubsteinSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Chaim Levanon St. 30, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel.
Benjamin W CornOncology Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Shmuel Bait St. 12, Jerusalem 9103102, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-2881-0326
Eitan AmirPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada.
Hadar GoldvaserOncology Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Shmuel Bait St. 12, Jerusalem 9103102, Israel.
Hebrew University of Jerusalem · ILTel Aviv University · ILUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Existing data on adding internal mammary nodal irradiation (IMNI) to the regional nodal fields are inconsistent. Methods: Randomized trials investigating the addition of IMNI to standard adjuvant radiation were identified. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted for overall-survival (OS), breast cancer specific-survival (BCSS), and disease-free survival (DFS) as well as distant-metastasis free survival (DMFS). The odds ratios (ORs) for regional and loco-regional recurrence, non-breast cancer mortality, secondary non-breast cancer, contralateral breast cancer, and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality were also extracted. Results: Analysis included five trials comprising 10,994 patients, predominantly with higher risk, lymph node positive disease. Compared to the control group, IMNI was associated with significant improvement in OS (HR = 0.91, p = 0.004), BCSS (HR = 0.84, p < 0.001), DFS (HR = 0.89, p= 0.01), and DMFS (HR = 0.89, p = 0.02). IMNI was also associated with reduced odds for regional (OR = 0.58, p < 0.001) and loco-regional recurrence (OR = 0.85, p = 0.04). The odds for cardiotoxicity were not statistically significantly higher (OR = 1.23, p = 0.07). There were comparable odds for cardiovascular mortality (OR = 1.00, p = 1.00), non-breast cancer mortality (OR = 1.05, p = 0.74), secondary cancer (OR = 0.95, p = 0.51), and contra-lateral breast cancer (OR = 1.07, 95% 0.77−1.51, p = 0.68). Conclusions: Compared to the control group, the addition of IMNI in high-risk patients is associated with a statistically significant improvement in survival, albeit with a magnitude of questionable clinical meaningfulness.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyBreast NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansLymph NodesRadiotherapy, Adjuvantbreast cancerinternal mammary irradiationradiotherapyregional nodal irradiation

Identifiers

PMID36135092
PMCPMC9497563
OpenAlexW4296251927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.