Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36135053›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2022

Chemotherapy Toxicity in Older Adults Optimized by Geriatric Assessment and Intervention: A Non-Comparative Analysis.

Munzir Hamid, Michelle Hannan, Nay Myo Oo, Paula Lynch, Darren J Walsh, Tara Matthews, Stephen Madden, Miriam O'Connor, Paula Calvert, Anne M Horgan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Investigation of the reasons and frequency of oncology patients over the age of 65 who apply to the emergency department.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Munzir HamidOncology Department, University Hospital Waterford, X91 ER8E Waterford, Ireland.
Michelle HannanOncology Department, University Hospital Waterford, X91 ER8E Waterford, Ireland.
Nay Myo OoOncology Department, University Hospital Waterford, X91 ER8E Waterford, Ireland.
Paula LynchOncology Department, University Hospital Waterford, X91 ER8E Waterford, Ireland.
Darren J WalshOncology Department, University Hospital Waterford, X91 ER8E Waterford, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-6840-0495
Tara MatthewsOncology Department, University Hospital Waterford, X91 ER8E Waterford, Ireland.
Stephen MaddenData Science Centre, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, D02 YN77 Dublin, Ireland.
Miriam O'ConnorOncology Department, University Hospital Waterford, X91 ER8E Waterford, Ireland.
Paula CalvertOncology Department, University Hospital Waterford, X91 ER8E Waterford, Ireland.
Anne M HorganOncology Department, University Hospital Waterford, X91 ER8E Waterford, Ireland.
University Hospital Waterford · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is recommended to guide treatment choices in older patients with cancer. Patients ≥ 70 years referred to our oncology service with a new cancer diagnosis are screened using the G-8. Patients with a score of ≤14 are eligible to attend the Geriatric Oncology and Liaison (GOAL) Clinic in our institution, with referral based on physician discretion. Referred patients undergo multidimensional assessments at baseline. CGA domains assessed include mobility, nutritional, cognitive, and psychological status. Chemotherapy toxicity risk is estimated using the Cancer Aging and Research Group (CARG) calculator. We undertook a retrospective analysis of patients attending the GOAL clinic over a 30-month period to April 2021. The objective was to determine rates of treatment dose modifications, delays, discontinuation, and unscheduled hospitalizations as surrogates for cytotoxic therapy toxicity in these patients. These data were collected retrospectively. Ninety-four patients received chemotherapy; the median age was 76 (70-87) and 45 were female (48%). Seventy-five (80%) had an ECOG PS of 0-1. Seventy-two (77%) had gastrointestinal cancer, and most had stage III (47%) or IV (40%) disease. Chemotherapy with curative intent was received by 51% (

Indexed as

Geriatric AssessmentNeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMedical OncologyRetrospective Studieschemotherapygeriatric assessmenthealthcare utilizationtoxicity

Identifiers

PMID36135053
PMCPMC9498117
OpenAlexW4293659508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.