Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36135024›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Comparative Analysis of NanoLuc Luciferase and Alkaline Phosphatase Luminescence Reporter Systems for Phage-Based Detection of Bacteria.

Shalini Wijeratne, Arindam Bakshi, Joey Talbert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prospects of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms in sustainable agriculture.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shalini WijeratneDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
Arindam BakshiDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
Joey TalbertDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2367-4676
Iowa State University · US

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2017-38420-26769
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reporter phage assays are a promising alternative to culture-based assays for rapidly detecting viable bacteria. The reporter systems used in phage-based detection are typically enzymes and their corresponding substrates that provide a signal following infection and expression. While several reporter systems have been developed, comparing reporter systems based on reported bacteria detection limits from literature can be challenging due to factors other than the reporter system that influence detection capabilities. To advance the development of phage-based assays, a systematic comparison and understanding of the components are necessary. The objective of this study was to directly compare two common enzyme-mediated luminescence reporter systems, NanoLuc/Nano-Glo and alkaline phosphatase (ALP*)/DynaLight, for phage-based detection of bacteria. The detection limits of the purified enzymes were determined, as well as the expression levels and bacteria detection capabilities following engineering of the coding genes into T7 phage and infection of

Indexed as

alkaline phosphatasebacteriophageE. coliluciferaseluminescenceNanoLucphagereporter

Identifiers

PMID36135024
PMCPMC9495952
OpenAlexW4296251808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.