Fast and Accurate Computation of the Displacement Force of Stent Grafts after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Abdominal Stent Graft Numerical Models to Virtually Simulate Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Scoping Review.EJVES vascular forum · 2026
   Review
2. Evaluation of Type I endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm using component quantification of energy loss: a preliminary feasibility study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
   Article
3. The role of fast approximate estimation displacement forces in prediction of stent-graft-related endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as