ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2022
A Multimodality Myocardial Perfusion Phantom: Initial Quantitative Imaging Results.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Imaging small dynamic lesions using positron emission tomography and computed tomography: anEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
- Fabrication and Dielectric Validation of an Arm Phantom for Electromyostimulation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This proof-of-concept study explores the multimodal application of a dedicated cardiac flow phantom for ground truth contrast measurements in dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging with CT, PET/CT, and MRI. A 3D-printed cardiac flow phantom and flow circuit mimics the shape of the left ventricular cavity (LVC) and three myocardial regions. The regions are filled with tissue-mimicking materials and the flow circuit regulates and measures contrast flow through LVC and myocardial regions. Normal tissue perfusion and perfusion deficits were simulated. Phantom measurements in PET/CT, CT, and MRI were evaluated with clinically used hardware and software. The reference arterial input flow was 4.0 L/min and myocardial flow 80 mL/min, corresponding to myocardial blood flow (MBF) of 1.6 mL/g/min. The phantom demonstrated successful completion of all processes involved in quantitative, multimodal myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) applications. Contrast kinetics in time intensity curves were in line with expectations for a mimicked perfusion deficit (38 s vs. 32 s in normal tissue). Derived MBF in PET/CT and CT led to under- and overestimation of reference flow of 0.9 mL/g/min and 4.5 mL/g/min, respectively. Simulated perfusion deficit (0.8 mL/g/min) in CT resulted in MBF of 2.8 mL/g/min. We successfully performed initial, quantitative perfusion measurements with a dedicated phantom setup utilizing clinical hardware and software. These results showcase the multimodal phantom's potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.