Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36134952›Full record

ReviewAntibodies (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Alternative Routes of Administration for Therapeutic Antibodies-State of the Art.

Aubin Pitiot, Nathalie Heuzé-Vourc'h, Thomas Sécher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Human Dorsal Root Ganglia Neuronal Cell Line to Study Nociceptive Signaling: A New Pipeline for Pain Therapy.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Biological Applications of Functionalized Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles.International journal of medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aubin PitiotINSERM, Centre d'Etude des Pathologies Respiratoires, U1100, F-37032 Tours, France.
Nathalie Heuzé-Vourc'hINSERM, Centre d'Etude des Pathologies Respiratoires, U1100, F-37032 Tours, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4929-5068
Thomas SécherINSERM, Centre d'Etude des Pathologies Respiratoires, U1100, F-37032 Tours, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7670-5424

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-10-LABX-53-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor the past two decades, there has been a huge expansion in the development of therapeutic antibodies, with 6 to 10 novel entities approved each year. Around 70% of these Abs are delivered through IV injection, a mode of administration allowing rapid and systemic delivery of the drug. However, according to the evidence presented in the literature, beyond the reduction of invasiveness, a better efficacy can be achieved with local delivery. Consequently, efforts have been made toward the development of innovative methods of administration, and in the formulation and engineering of novel Abs to improve their therapeutic index.

objectiveThis review presents an overview of the routes of administration used to deliver Abs, different from the IV route, whether approved or in the clinical evaluation stage. We provide a description of the physical and biological fundamentals for each route of administration, highlighting their relevance with examples of clinically-relevant Abs, and discussing their strengths and limitations.

methodsWe reviewed and analyzed the current literature, published as of the 1 April 2022 using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, as well as the FDA and EMA websites. Ongoing trials were identified using clinicaltrials.gov. Publications and data were identified using a list of general keywords.

conclusionsApart from the most commonly used IV route, topical delivery of Abs has shown clinical successes, improving drug bioavailability and efficacy while reducing side-effects. However, additional research is necessary to understand the consequences of biological barriers associated with local delivery for Ab partitioning, in order to optimize delivery methods and devices, and to adapt Ab formulation to local delivery. Novel modes of administration for Abs might in fine allow a better support to patients, especially in the context of chronic diseases, as well as a reduction of the treatment cost.

Indexed as

administration routesclinical trialsdrug deliverytherapeutic antibodies

Identifiers

PMID36134952
PMCPMC9495858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.