Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36134935›Full record

ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Topographic Orientation of Scaffolds for Tissue Regeneration: Recent Advances in Biomaterial Design and Applications.

Jiayu Chi, Mingyue Wang, Jialin Chen, Lizhi Hu, Zhixuan Chen, Ludvig J Backman, Wei Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Vitamin E incorporated in Carboxymethyl Cellulose-Gelatin Hydrogel Increases Wound Healing.International journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jiayu ChiSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China.
Mingyue WangSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China.
Jialin ChenSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China.
Lizhi HuSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China.
Zhixuan ChenSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China.
Ludvig J BackmanDepartment of Integrative Medical Biology, Anatomy, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Wei ZhangSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China.
Southeast University · CNUmeå University · SE

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31900962National Natural Science Foundation of China 81901903Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province BK20190356, BK20190354
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue engineering to develop alternatives for the maintenance, restoration, or enhancement of injured tissues and organs is gaining more and more attention. In tissue engineering, the scaffold used is one of the most critical elements. Its characteristics are expected to mimic the native extracellular matrix and its unique topographical structures. Recently, the topographies of scaffolds have received increasing attention, not least because different topographies, such as aligned and random, have different repair effects on various tissues. In this review, we have focused on various technologies (electrospinning, directional freeze-drying, magnetic freeze-casting, etching, and 3-D printing) to fabricate scaffolds with different topographic orientations, as well as discussed the physicochemical (mechanical properties, porosity, hydrophilicity, and degradation) and biological properties (morphology, distribution, adhesion, proliferation, and migration) of different topographies. Subsequently, we have compiled the effect of scaffold orientation on the regeneration of vessels, skin, neural tissue, bone, articular cartilage, ligaments, tendons, cardiac tissue, corneas, skeletal muscle, and smooth muscle. The compiled information in this review will facilitate the future development of optimal topographical scaffolds for the regeneration of certain tissues. In the majority of tissues, aligned scaffolds are more suitable than random scaffolds for tissue repair and regeneration. The underlying mechanism explaining the various effects of aligned and random orientation might be the differences in "contact guidance", which stimulate certain biological responses in cells.

Indexed as

biomaterialbiomimeticsorientationscaffoldtissue engineeringtissue regenerationtopography

Identifiers

PMID36134935
PMCPMC9496066
OpenAlexW4295560090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.