ArticleBiotech (Basel (Switzerland))2022
Preliminary Results on the Comparative Evaluation of Alkaline Phosphatase Commercial Tests Efficiency in Non-Cow Milk Pasteurization.
Article in Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Donkey Milk Quality and Safety: Challenges of Using the ISO 11816-1 ALP Method for Pasteurization Verification.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Donkey Colostrum and Milk: How Dietary Probiotics Can Affect Metabolomic Profile, Alkaline Sphingomyelinase and Alkaline Phosphatase Activity.Metabolites · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The demand for non-cow milk and the products derived from it, is constantly increasing; thus, correct and effective pasteurization becomes necessary. Typical practices for evaluating milk pasteurization are mainly based on the thermal inactivation of an endogenous enzyme, alkaline phosphatase (ALP). The ALP tests, originally designed and applied to pasteurized cow milk, are often used to control pasteurization in non-cow milk, without sufficient data on their suitability; EFSA calls on the scientific world for collecting more information on the subject. In this study, the pertinent details of the ALP assay for non-cow milk products are summarized, and a comparison is performed regarding the evaluation of the adequacy of commercially available tests for the determination of ALP activity in non-cow milk. At the same time, raw and pasteurized non-cow milk was analyzed microbiologically using standard ISO methods and MALDI-TOF MS in order to confirm the thermal effect on common microorganisms. In these preliminary results, various ALP tests do not appear to be fully reliable as indicators for the pasteurization of some types of non-cow milk such as camel and donkey milk or even goat and sheep milk, using the EFSA proposed limits. ALP commercial kits may not be suitable as pasteurization indicators for various types on non-cow milk, and alternatives should be investigated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.