Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36134833›Full record

ArticleRevista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)2022

Comparison between pain intensity, functionality, central sensitization, and self-efficacy in individuals with unilateral or bilateral knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study.

Leonardo Antônio Santos de Oliveira, André Pontes-Silva, Karen Larissa Brito Damasceno, Gabriel Henrique Santin Apahaza, Adriano Rodrigues de Oliveira, Almir Vieira Dibai-Filho, Mariana Arias Avila, Cid André Fidelis-de-Paula-Gomes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Association among clinical severity indicators, psychological health status and elastic properties of neck muscles in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Leonardo Antônio Santos de OliveiraUniversidade Nove de Julho, Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2804-7578
André Pontes-SilvaUniversidade Federal de São Carlos, Department of Physical Therapy, Study Group on Chronic Pain, Laboratory of Research on Electrophysical Agents - São Carlos (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3983-5342
Karen Larissa Brito DamascenoUniversidade Nove de Julho, Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5736-9613
Gabriel Henrique Santin ApahazaUniversidade Nove de Julho, Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4663-495X
Adriano Rodrigues de OliveiraUniversidade Nove de Julho, Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7848-7686
Almir Vieira Dibai-FilhoUniversidade Federal do Maranhão, Postgraduate Program in Adult Health, Research Group on Rehabilitation, Exercise, and Movement - São Luís (MA), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5403-8248
Mariana Arias AvilaUniversidade Federal de São Carlos, Department of Physical Therapy, Study Group on Chronic Pain, Laboratory of Research on Electrophysical Agents - São Carlos (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5081-5326
Cid André Fidelis-de-Paula-GomesUniversidade Nove de Julho, Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6627-7537

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to compare pain intensity, stiffness, functionality, central sensitization, and self-efficacy, between individuals with bilateral knee osteoarthritis and unilateral knee osteoarthritis.

methodsWe included sedentary participants with knee osteoarthritis. The diagnosis was defined by a specialist, in which there was a complaint of pain and/or altered function in the lower limbs (duration ≥3 months); morning stiffness; pain intensity ≥3; Kellgren-Lawrence 2-3° associated with X-ray; persistence of symptoms >3 months. We used the following tools: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, Numerical Pain Scale, Central Sensitization Inventory, and Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. Intergroup comparisons were performed using the t-test.

resultsThe sample consisted of 118 adult individuals, divided into two groups: bilateral knee osteoarthritis (n=59) and unilateral knee osteoarthritis (n=59). We observed a significant difference (p<0.05) and a large effect size (d≥0.8), in the comparisons between: stature, body mass index, physical function, central sensitization, and self-efficacy.

conclusionIndividuals with bilateral knee osteoarthritis have higher levels of central sensitization, impaired functionality, and a lower level of self-efficacy.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneeAdultCentral Nervous System SensitizationCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPainPain MeasurementSelf Efficacy

Identifiers

PMID36134833
PMCPMC9574988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.