ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2022
Postoperative reproductive results of infertile patients with intrauterine adhesions: A retrospective analysis.
Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Long-term effects of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis on postoperative pregnancy rates and fertility outcomes in patients with intrauterine adhesions.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Animal models of the placenta accreta spectrum: current status and further perspectives.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- A New Intrauterine Adhesions Classification System: The "Loddo Score".Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the reproductive outcomes after hysteroscopic separation of intrauterine adhesions (IUA) in infertile patients due to IUA.
methodsThis retrospective study enrolled patients with fertility requirements and infertility due to IUA. Data were collected from the hospital medical records and by follow-up by telephone. The impact on pregnancy and pregnancy outcome of preoperative adhesion, menstrual conditions before and after surgery and postoperative re-adhesion was analysed.
resultsA total of 106 patients (median age, 28 years) were enrolled in the study. There was a significant correlation between preoperative menstrual patterns and pregnancy rate. There were 56 pregnancies (pregnancy rate 52.83%) after the operation. Patients with improved menstruation after the operation had a significantly higher pregnancy rate (pregnancy rate 56.25%; 45 of 80 patients) compared with the patients that did not experience any improvement in their postoperative menstrual status (pregnancy rate 21.43%; three of 14 patients). Of the 56 pregnancies, 40 (71.43%) resulted in live births and six (10.71%) patients had miscarriages. A total of 54 of 56 patients (96.43%) became pregnant within 2 years.
conclusionPregnancy after intrauterine adhesion separation has a high rate of miscarriage and obstetric complications, so close monitoring of the patient is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.