Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36134481›Full record

ReviewDrug and alcohol review2023

Common strategies in empirically supported psychological interventions for alcohol use disorders: A meta-review.

Abhijit Nadkarni, Alessandro Massazza, Rahul Guda, Luanna T Fernandes, Ankur Garg, Mehak Jolly, Lena S Andersen, Urvita Bhatia, Sergiy Bogdanov, Bayard Roberts and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug and alcohol review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 7 countries.

Abhijit NadkarniDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5832-5236
Alessandro MassazzaDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Rahul GudaAddictions Research Group, Sangath, Goa, India.
Luanna T FernandesAddictions Research Group, Sangath, Goa, India.
Ankur GargAddictions Research Group, Sangath, Goa, India.
Mehak JollyAddictions Research Group, Sangath, Goa, India.
Lena S AndersenDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Urvita BhatiaAddictions Research Group, Sangath, Goa, India.
Sergiy BogdanovCentre for Mental Health and Psychosocial Support, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Bayard RobertsDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Wietse A TolDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Richard VellemanAddictions Research Group, Sangath, Goa, India.
Quincy MooreCentre for Mental Health and Psychosocial Support, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Daniela FuhrDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Sangath · INLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBNational University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy · UAUniversity of Copenhagen · DKHochschule Bremen · DE

Funding

Wellcome Trust 219468/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

issuesDespite the large number of effective psychological interventions for alcohol use disorders (AUD), there is still a lack of clarity concerning the strategies that make these interventions effective. APPROACH: The overall goal of this review was to identify, examine and synthesise the information about common strategies from evidence-based psychological interventions for AUDs by conducting a review of systematic reviews, that is, a meta-review. We isolated the relevant primary studies from eligible systematic reviews and extracted information about the interventions from these studies to understand the strategies used. Analysis was restricted to narrative summaries. KEY

findingsThirteen reviews were eligible for inclusion in our meta-review. Of these, eight demonstrated the effectiveness of a range of psychological interventions-behavioural couples therapy, cognitive behaviour therapy combined with motivational interviewing, brief interventions, contingency management, psychotherapy plus brief interventions, Alcoholics Anonymous and 12-step treatment programs, family-therapy or family-involved treatment, and community reinforcement approach. The most commonly used component strategies in effective interventions for AUDs included assessment, personalised feedback, motivational interviewing, goal setting, setting and review of homework, problem solving skills and relapse prevention/management. IMPLICATIONS: Evidence about commonly used strategies in evidence-based psychological interventions for AUDs offer the possibility of creating menu-driven interventions that can be tailored to respond to individual client needs and preferences in different contexts.

Indexed as

AlcoholismCognitive Behavioral TherapyHumansPsychosocial InterventionPsychotherapySystematic Reviews as Topicalcohol use disordersmeta-reviewpsychological treatments

Identifiers

PMID36134481
PMCPMC10087716
OpenAlexW4296627563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.