Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36134382›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2022

Protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomized quality improvement project to evaluate the impact of medical safety huddles on patient safety.

Meiqi Guo, Mark Bayley, Peter Cram, Richard Dunbar-Yaffe, Christian Fortin, Katharyn Go, Lauren Linett, John Matelski, Amanda Mayo, Jordan Pelc and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Meiqi GuoToronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, 550 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, M5G2A2, Canada.
Mark BayleyToronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, 550 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, M5G2A2, Canada.
Peter CramDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Cir, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A8, Canada.
Richard Dunbar-YaffeDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Cir, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A8, Canada.
Christian FortinDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Cir, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A8, Canada.
Katharyn GoPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 610 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C1, Canada.
Lauren LinettPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 610 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C1, Canada.
John MatelskiBiostatistics Research Unit, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth St, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4, Canada.
Amanda MayoDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Cir, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A8, Canada.
Jordan PelcHennick Bridgepoint Hospital, Sinai Health System, 1 Bridgepoint Dr, Toronto, Ontario, M4M 2B5, Canada.
Lawrence R RobinsonDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Cir, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A8, Canada.
Leahora RotteauCentre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, 525 University Ave, Suite 630, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2L3, Canada.
Jesse WolfstadtMount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, 600 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5, Canada.
Christine SoongDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Cir, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A8, Canada.
University of New Brunswick · CAUniversity Health Network · CAMount Sinai Hospital · CACanadian Patient Safety Institute · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Physician engagement is crucial for furthering patient safety and quality improvement within healthcare organizations. Medical Safety Huddles, which are physician-specific huddles, is a novel way to engage physicians with patient safety and may reduce adverse events experienced by patients. We plan to conduct a multi-center quality improvement (QI) initiative to implement and evaluate Medical Safety Huddles. The primary objective is to determine the impact of the huddles on adverse events experienced by patients. Secondary objectives include assessing the impact of the huddles on patient safety culture and physician engagement, and a process evaluation to assess the fidelity of implementation. Methods: This stepped wedge cluster randomized study will be conducted at four academic inpatient hospitals over 19 months. Each site will adapt Medical Safety Huddles to its own practice context to best engage physicians. We will review randomly selected patient charts for adverse events. Generalized linear mixed effects regression will be used to estimate the overall intervention effect on adverse events. Process measures such as physician attendance rates and number of safety issues raised per huddle will be tracked to monitor implementation adherence. Conclusion: Medical Safety Huddles may help healthcare organizations and medical leaders to better engage physicians with patient safety. The project results will assess the fidelity of implementation and determine the impact of Medical Safety Huddles on patient safety.

Indexed as

HuddlesPatient safetyPhysician engagementQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID36134382
PMCPMC9483722
OpenAlexW4295066934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.