ArticleInternational journal of clinical practice2022
A Nomogram to Better Predict the In-Hospital Mortality of Trauma Patients with Sepsis in the Intensive Care Unit.
Article in International journal of clinical practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Predictive Modelling of Post-Traumatic Sepsis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- Temporal Trend and Research Focus of Injury Burden from 1998 to 2022: A Bibliometric Analysis.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023Article
- The predictive values of admission characteristics for 28-day all-cause mortality in septic patients with diabetes mellitus: a study from the MIMIC database.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Trauma has a high incidence and mortality worldwide, and sepsis is one of the main causes of mortality in trauma patients. Therefore, it is essential to identify the risk factors of in-hospital mortality for trauma patients with sepsis. Methods: Data were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III database and divided into a training set and internal validation set, and another Chinese dataset was used as external validation set. Then, risk factors were estimated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses in the training set. Finally, a nomogram was created to predict the probability of in-hospital mortality for trauma patients with sepsis. Results: A total of 503 patients were enrolled in our study (335 in the training set and 168 in the validation set). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age (1.047 [1.025-1.071]), respiratory rate (1.258 [1.135-1.394]), PTT (1.026 [1.008-1.044]), ventilation (6.703 [1.528-29.408]), and vasopressor use (3.682 [1.502-9.025]) were independent factors associated with in-hospital mortality. The nomogram for trauma-related sepsis predicted in-hospital mortality with AUC values of 0.8939 in the training set, 0.8200 in the internal validation set, and 0.7779 in the external validation set. Conclusions: The new nomogram has a well predicted value for in-hospital mortality for patients with trauma and sepsis in intensive care units.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.