SynthesisCardiovascular therapeutics2022
Vascular Closure Devices versus Manual Compression in Cardiac Interventional Procedures: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Cardiovascular therapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early Mobilization after Cardiac Catheterization via Femoral Artery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- External Suture-Retention Device Versus Manual Compression for Venous Access-Site Closure Post-Ablation: The LockeT II Study.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2026Trial
- Vascular closure devices in electrophysiology procedures: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Heart rhythm O2 · 2026Article
- Safety and Feasibility of Same-Day Discharge After Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Venous Closure Devices for Femoral Venous Access in Interventional Cardiology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Early experience with CELT ACD vascular access closure device for neurointerventional procedures.The journal of vascular access · 2026Article
- A large puncture closer of aortic wall by multi-memory actions with thrombo-hemodynamic control.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- CELT vascular closure device for larger NES arteriotomies: A single-center retrospective analysis.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025Article
- Sheep femoral artery occlusion is well tolerated and does not result in ischemia.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2025Article
- Coronary Revascularization in Patients with Hemophilia and Acute Coronary Syndrome: Case Report and Brief Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- On MANTA vascular closure devices following veno arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Effectiveness and complications.World journal of cardiology · 2025Article
- FEMOSEAL CLOSE: multi-centre observational study with FemoSeal™ vascular closure device following peripheral percutaneous endovascular procedures.CVIR endovascular · 2025Article
- Advancements in Vascular Closure Devices for Effective Hemostasis in Femoral Artery Interventions.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024Review
- A Novel Suture-Based Vascular Closure Device to Achieve Hemostasis after Venous or Arterial Access While Leaving Nothing behind: A Review of the Technological Assessment and Early Clinical Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Iatrogenic Vascular Injuries in Resource-Limited Setting: A 4-Year Experience Monocentric Retrospective Study.Open access emergency medicine : OAEM · 2024Article
- Efficacy and Safety of AxiostatJournal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Backgrounds: Manual compression (MC) and vascular closure device (VCD) are two methods of vascular access site hemostasis after cardiac interventional procedures. However, there is still controversial over the use of them and a lack of comprehensive and systematic meta-analysis on this issue. Methods: Original articles comparing VCD and MC in cardiac interventional procedures were searched in PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science through April 2022. Efficacy, safety, patient satisfaction, and other parameters were assessed between two groups. Heterogeneity among studies was evaluated by Results: A total of 32 studies were included after screening with inclusion and exclusion criteria (33481 patients). This meta-analysis found that VCD resulted in shorter time to hemostasis, ambulation, and discharge ( Conclusions: Compared with MC, the use of VCDs significantly shortens the time of hemostasis and allows earlier ambulation and discharge, meanwhile without increase in vascular complications. In addition, use of VCDs achieves higher patient satisfaction and leads cost savings for patients and institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.