ArticleCureus2022
Post-mortem CT: A Useful Tool to Confirm a Case of Suspected Sudden Cardiac Death.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is defined as the unexpected death of an individual, not due to any extracardiac cause, occurring within one hour of symptom onset or within 24 hours of last being seen in good health if the death is unwitnessed. Forensic pathologists routinely encounter several SCD cases in their practice. The presentation of such cases can be of two types; firstly, with typical signs and symptoms suggestive of cardiac pathology, and secondly, devoid of any presentation history. This history helps forensic pathologists look for relevant findings during the autopsy examination. The authors intend to explore the feasibility of using advanced radiological techniques like post-mortem CT (PMCT) in determining the cause of death through a minimally invasive approach. In the present case, a 65-year-old male was found unresponsive at his residence on the morning of his death. He had a history of dull chest pain for the past two days, which had resolved after he self-prescribed a few medications. The presenting complaint of chest pain had started the intervening night prior to his death. The deceased was a known case of hypertension and was not compliant with treatment, as stated by the relatives. He was declared as brought dead by the treating emergency medicine physician at the Fortis Flt. Lt. Rajan Dhall Hospital and the body was sent by the authorities to the mortuary of the Department of Forensic Medicine, AIIMS, New Delhi for autopsy examination since an autopsy should be conducted by a government hospital or institute by law. PMCT depicted an alternate hyperdense and hypodense region circumferentially surrounding the heart, indicating hemopericardium. It was followed by a traditional autopsy and histopathology examination, which confirmed the presence of hemopericardium and left ventricular rupture associated with acute coronary insufficiency. Such cases with an indicative history, circumstantial evidence, and PMCT findings can be considered for minimal invasive autopsy. If the external findings indicate the application of physical force, then an explorative dissection could be done. Therefore, we conclude that PMCT can be used as a reliable tool for determining the cause of death in SCDs on a case-to-case basis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.