Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36134038›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction open2022

The needs of subfertile couples continuing to attempt natural conception: in-depth interviews.

Felicia Dreischor, Ellen T M Laan, Fleur Peeters, Karen Peeraer, Cornelis B Lambalk, Mariëtte Goddijn, Inge M Custers, Eline A F Dancet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Felicia DreischorDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5421-8273
Ellen T M LaanDepartment of Sexology and Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6084-9207
Fleur PeetersDepartment of Development and Regeneration, University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Leuven, Belgium.
Karen PeeraerDepartment of Development and Regeneration, University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Leuven, Belgium.
Cornelis B LambalkDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Division of Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3947-5129
Mariëtte GoddijnDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9928-9673
Inge M CustersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eline A F DancetDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0356-930X
University of Amsterdam · NLKU Leuven · BEVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionWhat are the experiences and the support and sexual advice needs of subfertile couples continuing to attempt natural conception after the diagnostic fertility work-up? SUMMARY ANSWER: Exploration of the experiences of couples showed that couples would have appreciated fertility clinic staff embedding expectant management into the fertility clinic trajectory, supportive staff with female and male patient interactions and advice on common experiences of peers and on managing their lifestyle, distress and subfertility-related sexual challenges. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Dutch and British professional guidelines advise newly diagnosed subfertile couples with a 'good prognosis' to continue to attempt natural conception and do not require fertility clinic staff to interact with patients. Fertility clinic staff and subfertile couples struggle to follow these guidelines as they feel an urgent need for action. Subfertile couples might benefit from sexual advice, as subfertility is negatively associated with sexual functioning, which is important for natural conception. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: Twelve one-time in-depth interviews (2015-2017) were conducted with 10 heterosexual couples and 2 women whose partners did not participate, then the interviews were subjected to inductive content analysis, reaching inductive thematic saturation. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING

methodsThe 22 interviewees had experienced 3-18 months of expectant management after their diagnostic fertility work-up in a Belgian or a Dutch tertiary fertility clinic. The face-to-face in-depth interviews explored positive and negative experiences and unmet needs. The transcribed interviews were subjected to inductive content analysis, by two researchers discussing initial disagreements. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Couples would appreciate fertility clinic staff embedding expectant management in the fertility clinic trajectory, by starting off with reassuring couples that their very thorough diagnostic fertility work-up demonstrated their good chance of natural conception, and by involving couples in deciding on the duration of expectant management and by planning the follow-up appointment after expectant management up front. Couples had encountered sexual challenges during expectant management and had an interest in sexual advice, focused on increasing pleasure and partner bonding and preventing the rise of dysfunctions. The couples agreed that a (secured) website with evidence-based, non-patronizing text and mixed media would be an appropriate format for a novel support programme. Couples were keen for interactions with fertility clinic staff which addressed both partners of subfertile couples. Couples also valued advice on managing their lifestyle and distress and would have liked information on the experiences of their peers. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: Recall bias is plausible given the retrospective nature of this study. This explorative interview study was not designed for examining country or gender differences in experiences and needs but it did generate new findings on inter-country differences. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsRather than simply advising expectant management, fertility clinics are encouraged to offer couples who continue to attempt natural conception after their diagnostic fertility work-up, supportive patient-staff interactions with advice on common experiences of peers and on managing their lifestyle, distress and sexual challenges related to subfertility. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: Funded by Flanders Research Foundation and the University of Amsterdam. There are no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Indexed as

healthy lifestyleinfertilityqualitative researchsex counsellingsex education

Identifiers

PMID36134038
PMCPMC9479888
OpenAlexW4294680473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.