Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36134027›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022

Multi-trait genome prediction of new environments with partial least squares.

Osval A Montesinos-López, Abelardo Montesinos-López, David Alejandro Bernal Sandoval, Brandon Alejandro Mosqueda-Gonzalez, Marco Alberto Valenzo-Jiménez, José Crossa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. GIS-FA: an approach to integrating thematic maps, factor-analytic, and envirotyping for cultivar targeting.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Osval A Montesinos-LópezFacultad de Telemática, Universidad de Colima, Colima, Mexico.
Abelardo Montesinos-LópezCentro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico.
David Alejandro Bernal SandovalFacultad de Telemática, Universidad de Colima, Colima, Mexico.
Brandon Alejandro Mosqueda-GonzalezCentro de Investigación en Computación (CIC), Instituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN), Mexico City, Mexico.
Marco Alberto Valenzo-JiménezUniversidad Michoacana de San Nicolas de Hidalgo (UMSNH), Avenida Francisco J. Mujica S/N Ciudad Universitaria, Morelia, MC, Mexico.
José CrossaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, Texcoco, Edo. de Mexico, Mexico.
Universidad de Colima · MXCentro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz Y Trigo · MXInstituto Politécnico Nacional · MXUniversidad de Guadalajara · MXUniversidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genomic selection (GS) methodology proposed over 20 years ago by Meuwissen et al. (Genetics, 2001) has revolutionized plant breeding. A predictive methodology that trains statistical machine learning algorithms with phenotypic and genotypic data of a reference population and makes predictions for genotyped candidate lines, GS saves significant resources in the selection of candidate individuals. However, its practical implementation is still challenging when the plant breeder is interested in the prediction of future seasons or new locations and/or environments, which is called the "leave one environment out" issue. Furthermore, because the distributions of the training and testing set do not match, most statistical machine learning methods struggle to produce moderate or reasonable prediction accuracies. For this reason, the main objective of this study was to explore the use of the multi-trait partial least square (MT-PLS) regression methodology for this specific task, benchmarking its performance with the Bayesian Multi-trait Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor (MT-GBLUP) method. The benchmarking process was performed with five actual data sets. We found that in all data sets the MT-PLS method outperformed the popular MT-GBLUP method by 349.8% (under predictor E + G), 484.4% (under predictor E + G + GE; where E denotes environments, G genotypes and GE the genotype by environment interaction) and 15.9% (under predictor G + GE) across traits. Our results provide empirical evidence of the power of the MT-PLS methodology for the prediction of future seasons or new environments. Furthermore, the comparison between single univariate-trait (UT) versus MT for GBLUP and PLS gave an increase in prediction accuracy of MT-GBLUP versus UT-GBLUP, but not for MT-PLS versus UT-PLS.

Indexed as

genomic predictiongenotype × environment interactionmulti-trait partial least squaresprediction of one complete environmentsingle-trait partial least squares

Identifiers

PMID36134027
PMCPMC9483856
OpenAlexW4294613031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.