ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022
Investigation of the transability of dietary small non-coding RNAs to animals.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeting Regulatory Noncoding RNAs in Human Cancer: The State of the Art in Clinical Trials.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Dietary intervention for tertiary prevention in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma survivors: clinical and translational results of a randomized phase II trial.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our daily diet not only provides essential nutrients needed for survival and growth but also supplies bioactive ingredients to promote health and prevent disease. Recent studies have shown that exogenous microRNAs (miRNAs), xenomiRs, may enter the consumer's body through dietary intake and regulate gene expression. This fascinating phenomenon suggests that xenomiRs can act as a new class of bioactive substances associated with mammalian systems. In contrast, several studies have failed to detect xenomiRs in consumers and reported that the observed diet-derived miRNAs in the previous studies can be related to the false positive effects of experiments. This discrepancy can be attributed to the potential artifacts related to the process of experiments, small sample size, and inefficient bioinformatics pipeline. Since this hypothesis is not generally accepted yet, more studies are required. Here, a stringent and reliable bioinformatics pipeline was used to analyze 133 miRNA sequencing data from seven different studies to investigate this phenomenon. Generally, our results do not support the transfer of diet-derived miRNAs into the animal/human tissues in every situation. Briefly, xenomiRs were absent from most samples, and also, their expressions were very low in the samples where they were present, which is unlikely to be sufficient to regulate cell transcripts. Furthermore, this study showed that the possibility of miRNAs being absorbed through animals' diets and thus influencing gene expression during specific periods of biological development is not inconceivable. In this context, our results were in agreement with the theory of the transfer of small RNAs under certain conditions and periods as xenomiRs were found in colostrum which may modulate infants' immune systems
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.