ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2022
Clinical outcomes of dose-escalated re-irradiation in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma.
Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reirradiation versus systemic therapy versus combination therapy for recurrent high-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and toxicity.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Water-soluble fullerene derivatives mitigate cranial radiation-induced neuroinflammation and cognitive dysfunction.Biomedical microdevices · 2026Article
- Initial observations on dose optimization inFrontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Preferred Imaging for Target Volume Delineation for Radiotherapy of Recurrent Glioblastoma: A Literature Review of the Available Evidence.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Re-irradiation for recurrent gliomas is a controversial treatment option with no clear standard dose or concurrent systemic therapy. Methods: This series represents a single-institution retrospective review of patients treated with re-irradiation for recurrent high-grade glioma. After 2012, patients were commonly offered concurrent bevacizumab as a cytoprotective agent against radiation necrosis. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival and progression-free survival. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify factors associated with overall survival and progression-free survival. Results: Between 2001 and 2021, 52 patients underwent re-irradiation for a diagnosis of recurrent high-grade glioma. 36 patients (69.2%) had a histologic diagnosis of glioblastoma at the time of re-irradiation. The median BED10 (biological equivalent dose 10 Gy) of re-irradiation was 53.1 Gy. Twenty-one patients (40.4%) received concurrent bevacizumab with re-irradiation. Median survival for the entire cohort and for glioblastoma at the time of recurrence patients was 6.7 months and 6.0 months, respectively. For patients with glioblastoma at the time of recurrence, completing re-irradiation (HR 0.03, Conclusion: High dose re-irradiation with concurrent bevacizumab is feasible in patients with recurrent gliomas. Concurrent bevacizumab and increasing radiation dose may improve survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.