Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36133977›Full record

ArticleNanoscale advances2020

Interdependence of charge and secondary structure on cellular uptake of cell penetrating peptide functionalized silica nanoparticles.

Isabel Gessner, Annika Klimpel, Merlin Klußmann, Ines Neundorf, Sanjay Mathur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanoscale advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Induction and Stabilization of Peptide Alpha-Helices on Silica Nanoparticles.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Isabel GessnerInstitute of Inorganic Chemistry, University of Cologne Greinstr. 6 50939 Cologne Germany sanjay.mathur@uni-koeln.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9674-161X
Annika KlimpelInstitute of Biochemistry, University of Cologne Zuelpicher Str. 47 50674 Cologne Germany ines.neundorf@uni-koeln.de.
Merlin KlußmannInstitute of Biochemistry, University of Cologne Zuelpicher Str. 47 50674 Cologne Germany ines.neundorf@uni-koeln.de.
Ines NeundorfInstitute of Biochemistry, University of Cologne Zuelpicher Str. 47 50674 Cologne Germany ines.neundorf@uni-koeln.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6450-3991
Sanjay MathurInstitute of Inorganic Chemistry, University of Cologne Greinstr. 6 50939 Cologne Germany sanjay.mathur@uni-koeln.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2765-2693

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The capability of cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) to enable translocation of cargos across biological barriers shows promising pharmaceutical potential for the transport of drug molecules, as well as nanomaterials, into cells. Herein, we report on the optimization of a CPP, namely sC18, in terms of its translocation efficiency and investigate new CPPs regarding their interaction with silica nanoparticles (NPs). First, alanine scanning of sC18 yielded 16 cationic peptides from which two were selected for further studies. Whereas in the first case, a higher positive net charge and enhanced amphipathicity resulted in significantly higher internalization rates than sC18, the second one demonstrated reduced cellular uptake efficiencies and served as a control. We then attached these CPPs to silica nanoparticles of different sizes (50, 150 and 300 nm)

Identifiers

PMID36133977
PMCPMC9418617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.