Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36133945›Full record

ReviewNanoscale advances2021

Recent progress in cellulose-based electrospun nanofibers as multifunctional materials.

Yirong Zhang, Cunzhi Zhang, Yixiang Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanoscale advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Environmental and Ecological Monitoring with Biodegradable Technologies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Recent Advances in Electrospinning Techniques for Precise Medicine.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yirong ZhangDepartment of Food Science and Agricultural Chemistry, McGill University 21111 Lakeshore Ste Anne de Bellevue Quebec H9X 3V9 Canada yixiang.wang@mcgill.ca.
Cunzhi ZhangDepartment of Food Science and Agricultural Chemistry, McGill University 21111 Lakeshore Ste Anne de Bellevue Quebec H9X 3V9 Canada yixiang.wang@mcgill.ca.
Yixiang WangDepartment of Food Science and Agricultural Chemistry, McGill University 21111 Lakeshore Ste Anne de Bellevue Quebec H9X 3V9 Canada yixiang.wang@mcgill.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8386-7491

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellulose, the most abundant natural polymer, has good biocompatibility, biodegradability, and non-toxicity, which make it and its derivatives promising candidates for the fabrication of multifunctional materials, while maintaining sustainability and environmental friendliness. The combination of electrospinning technology and cellulose (and its derivatives) provides a feasible approach to produce nanostructured porous materials with promising functionalities, flexibility, renewability and biodegradability. At the same time, it enables value-added applications of cellulose and its derivatives that are derived from nature or even biomass waste. This review summarizes and discusses the latest progress in cellulose-based electrospun nanofibers, including their construction methods and conditions, various available raw materials, and applications in multiple areas (water treatment, biomaterials, sensors, electro-conductive materials, active packaging, and so on), which are followed by the conclusion and prospects associated with future opportunities and challenges in this active research area.

Identifiers

PMID36133945
PMCPMC9417631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.